The American Jobs Emergency Requires Action

economyThis is not a recovery. It’s a continuing jobs emergency and it demands action.

We learned Friday morning that unemployment rose to 9.8 percent in November and employers added only 39,000 jobs. Private employers added 50,000 — the smallest gain since January. Government employment continued to shrink.

We’re heading in the wrong direction. In October, the jobless rate was 9.6 percent, and employers added 172,000 jobs. Private-sector job growth totaled 160,000.

At this rate unemployment won’t return to its pre-recession level for more than a decade, if ever.

Over 15 million Americans were jobless in November. This doesn’t include those who are working part-time but would prefer to work full time. Nor does it include a record 1.3 million who are too discouraged even to look for work.

Nor does it take account of the fact that most families are dependent on two breadwinners. So to figure out the true impact on most families, all these numbers have to be doubled.

Nor does it reflect the fact that the level of unemployment tracks level of education. Only 5 percent of those with college degrees are now unemployed, while more than 20 percent of everyone else is without work.

Maybe that’s why Washington doesn’t get it. The Washington echo chamber is filled with college degrees.

The Big Money economy on Wall Street and in corporate suites doesn’t get it, either. They’re doing marvelously well because they’re tied to rapidly-growing markets in China, India, and Brazil.

But the Average Worker economy on Main Street continues to wallow.

The Problem
Let’s be clear about this. The problem is lack of sufficient demand for workers.

There are only four sources of demand. The biggest source is American consumers, who comprise about 70 percent of economic activity.

But the vast American middle and working class can’t and won’t buy enough to get people back to work. They’re still under a huge debt load.

Even if and when they pay it off, their buying days are gone. The Great Recession took away their last means of coping with years of stagnant wages — going deeper into debt by using their homes as collateral. The housing bubble burst, and home prices continue to drop.

The second source of domestic demand is business. But businesses won’t hire more workers without more customers.

(Republican supply-siders say businesses are not hiring because they’re uncertain about the effects of the new health care law and don’t know how much taxes they’ll have to pay. This is political claptrap. Supply-siders also say businesses would start hiring if their taxes were lower. But businesses are sitting on almost a trillion dollars of cash. They don’t need lower taxes in order to hire more Americans. They need more American customers.)

The third source of domestic demand is net exports. But they’re going nowhere. Although China, India, and Brazil are buying goods and services from American companies — and thereby boosting US profits — those US companies are making most of what they sell there in those countries. GM is selling more cars in China than in the US now, and manufacturing them in China.

That leaves the fourth source of domestic demand — government. But it’s not nearly filling the gap. To the contrary, state and local governments are broke, and are cutting spending and raising taxes to the tune of over $110 billion this year. The federal government’s much-maligned stimulus is about gone (almost all economists believe it saved over 3 million jobs).

The Fed is pumping $600 billion into the economy, but without an expansive fiscal policy this is only fueling speculation.

Instead, austerity and deficit reduction are the new buzz-words in Washington, as well as in Europe — which is absurd given what’s happening to the economy.

Republicans won’t even vote to extend unemployment benefits for the record number of Americans — almost half the unemployed — who have been out of work for six months or more. Starting today, 800,000 of the long-term unemployed lose their benefits. Unless Congress moves quickly, by the end of December, 2 million more will lose them.

What Must Be Done

  • Extend unemployment benefits. Not only do unemployment benefits help families who are hurting; they also put money into their pockets that they’ll then spend — and their spending will keep other Americans in jobs. I was on television Thursday debating a Republican who insisted unemployment benefits deter the jobless from finding work. Another partisan bromide. When, as now, five people are out of work for every job opening — and when, as now, unemployment benefits in most states are a small fraction of someone’s former wage — it’s bizarre to argue that unemployment benefits are causing unemployment.
  • Create a new WPA and National Infrastructure Bank. Not only do we need extended unemployment benefits. We need a new WPA, modeled after the WPA of the Great Depression, to put jobless Americans to work. We need a national infrastructure bank to rebuild our crumbling highways and water and sewer systems, thereby putting additional people back to work.
  • Cut payroll taxes and enlarge the EITC. We should exempt the first $20,000 of income from the payroll tax, thereby putting more money into the pockets of lower-wage workers — which they’ll spend. We should extend the Earned Income Tax Credit — a wage subsidy — upward through the middle class, and reduce taxes on everyone up to $80,000 of income.

How to pay for this. Not in 70 years has so much of the nation’s income been at the very top. Pay for all of this with a 2% surcharge on incomes between $1 million and $2 million, a 3% surcharge on incomes between $2 million and $5 million, and a 5% surcharge on all incomes over $5 million. Add in a .5 percent transaction tax on all financial transactions.

Why Would Republicans and Conservative Dems Ever Agree?
They’ll agree to measures like this when they understand that our choice is either such reforms or continued economic stresses for millions of American families — stresses that will translate into an ever angrier and more divisive politics.

(When I wrote my new book “Aftershock,” I hoped what I saw unfolding would not become the new reality. It is.)

They’ll agree when they see that we can not go back to the old “normal” of an unprecedented concentration of income and wealth at the top, because that old normal got us into the present fix.

It undermines the purchasing power of the rest of America. It invites speculation on Wall Street.

And it translates into extraordinary political power of a moneyed elite hell-bent on gaining even more power and wealth, and preventing the rest of America from flourishing.

Robert ReichBut why would this moneyed elite ever agree? They’ll agree when they understand this is a lousing strategy for even for them.

Those at the top would do better with a smaller share of a booming economy that elicits a positive politics, than they will do with an ever-larger share of an anemic economy that fuels the politics of anger.

They should convey this message to their bought-for representatives in Congress.

Robert Reich

Republished with permission.

Comments

  1. Jay Levenberg,Esq. says

    There are two problems that are very serious. Lack of demand is one of them. Without a demand for products, no amount of incentives by tax reductions will do any good. On the other hand, continuing unemployment benefits alone does not force people to take jobs available that they may not want instead of the benefits. It’s a vicious circle. 99 weeks of unemployment benefits may not be enough but there should be a finite limit known in advance to the beneficiaries. To push demand, the government could offer instant rebates to those that purchase new appliances similar to what has been done in China. This would work much better than tax cuts to spur demand and would cost the government a lot less. Make-shift work as was done during the Depression won’t work because we have a much different workforce today than in those years. You cannot ask someone with a BA degree in English to dig a ditch. Even Mr. Reich knows that principle.

    The other problem is that our kids are not receiving an education necessary to compete with other world economic powers. Today, the kids want instant gratification and we have created a lazy, uninterested group of youth, some of whom simply don’t care about education. This is where parents and those in parental control must start exercising their authority to change attitudes. I have been substitute teaching for some years and have seen first hand that many bright students, put in the same classes with mediocre students (called “mainstreaming”) leads to benfits for neither group. Educators that have pushed this philosophy have missed the mark widely. We must get back to putting students together who are of similar talents. It may not be “politically correct” but it must be done if we are to compete with the rest of the world.

  2. Minister Lawrence says

    You’d think that America with all its schools of Higher Learning wouldn’t be in the state it,s in. It seems to me this Country acts all the more “United” only when all ‘H…’ has broke out,then its; We The People Work Together or “We All Catch H… Together”. The Rich and not so rich. The Poor and not so poor. Why is that? What do we the people learn in our schools ?

    What we see and feel is what we got. And it did not fall out of the sky. We The People Made It and WE THE PEOPLE CAN FIX IT,OR TO BAD FOR US.

  3. says

    Let me get this right. Robert Reich is equating the WPA with unemployment benefits?

    While I believe much of what FDR did was represssive in regard to bullying farmers and imprisoning US citizens in internment camps, many of the works of the WPA have ultimately resulted in enduring results like the hydroelectric dams and the rural electification co-ops.

    What we know is his welfare programs made war on the poor by using our national treasures for temporary benefits instead of investment in the means of production.

    We won WW2 because the “rich,” called “one dollar men” turned our means of production into a weapon of war in which every man and woman contributed to our victory.

    The “rich” never have their income decreased by taxes. They cut their labor costs and increase joblessness. If that does not work, they pass on taxes to consumers with higher prices.

    That is an economic principle. It is a lesson Robert Reich and his ilk have never learned.

    • Don Duitz says

      What you may not consider is that the rich didn’t mind contributing to saving America when there was an overwhelming emergency.
      This is an emergency and it will not go away by enriching the already rich.
      In fact, by impoverishing much of the population the elite are setting in motion their own demise and national chaos to boot.
      Don’t forget we have had prosperity under FDR’s basic structures for almost 70 years.
      Prior to that, under the old capitalism we had bread lines every 10 to 15 years. Is that what you wish?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *