How the War on Drugs Gave Birth to a Permanent American Undercaste

American War On DrugsEver since Barack Obama lifted his right hand and took his oath of office, pledging to serve the United States as its 44th president, ordinary people and their leaders around the globe have been celebrating our nation’s “triumph over race.” Obama’s election has been touted as the final nail in the coffin of Jim Crow, the bookend placed on the history of racial caste in America.

Obama’s mere presence in the Oval Office is offered as proof that “the land of the free” has finally made good on its promise of equality. There’s an implicit yet undeniable message embedded in his appearance on the world stage: this is what freedom looks like; this is what democracy can do for you. If you are poor, marginalized, or relegated to an inferior caste, there is hope for you. Trust us. Trust our rules, laws, customs, and wars. You, too, can get to the promised land.

Perhaps greater lies have been told in the past century, but they can be counted on one hand. Racial caste is alive and well in America.

Most people don’t like it when I say this. It makes them angry. In the “era of colorblindness” there’s a nearly fanatical desire to cling to the myth that we as a nation have “moved beyond” race. Here are a few facts that run counter to that triumphant racial narrative:

  • There are more African Americans under correctional control today — in prison or jail, on probation or parole — than were enslaved in 1850, a decade before the Civil War began.
  • As of 2004, more African American men were disenfranchised (due to felon disenfranchisement laws) than in 1870, the year the Fifteenth Amendment was ratified, prohibiting laws that explicitly deny the right to vote on the basis of race.
  • A black child born today is less likely to be raised by both parents than a black child born during slavery. The recent disintegration of the African American family is due in large part to the mass imprisonment of black fathers.
  • If you take into account prisoners, a large majority of African American men in some urban areas have been labeled felons for life. (In the Chicago area, the figure is nearly 80%.) These men are part of a growing undercaste — not class, caste — permanently relegated, by law, to a second-class status. They can be denied the right to vote, automatically excluded from juries, and legally discriminated against in employment, housing, access to education, and public benefits, much as their grandparents and great-grandparents were during the Jim Crow era.

Excuses for the Lockdown

There is, of course, a colorblind explanation for all this: crime rates. Our prison population has exploded from about 300,000 to more than 2 million in a few short decades, it is said, because of rampant crime. We’re told that the reason so many black and brown men find themselves behind bars and ushered into a permanent, second-class status is because they happen to be the bad guys.

The uncomfortable truth, however, is that crime rates do not explain the sudden and dramatic mass incarceration of African Americans during the past 30 years. Crime rates have fluctuated over the last few decades — they are currently are at historical lows — but imprisonment rates have consistently soared. Quintupled, in fact. And the vast majority of that increase is due to the War on Drugs. Drug offenses alone account for about two-thirds of the increase in the federal inmate population, and more than half of the increase in the state prison population.

The drug war has been brutal — complete with SWAT teams, tanks, bazookas, grenade launchers, and sweeps of entire neighborhoods — but those who live in white communities have little clue to the devastation wrought. This war has been waged almost exclusively in poor communities of color, even though studies consistently show that people of all colors use and sell illegal drugs at remarkably similar rates. In fact, some studies indicate that white youth are significantly more likely to engage in illegal drug dealing than black youth. Any notion that drug use among African Americans is more severe or dangerous is belied by the data. White youth, for example, have about three times the number of drug-related visits to the emergency room as their African American counterparts.

That is not what you would guess, though, when entering our nation’s prisons and jails, overflowing as they are with black and brown drug offenders. In some states, African Americans comprise 80%-90% of all drug offenders sent to prison.

This is the point at which I am typically interrupted and reminded that black men have higher rates of violent crime. That’s why the drug war is waged in poor communities of color and not middle-class suburbs. Drug warriors are trying to get rid of those drug kingpins and violent offenders who make ghetto communities a living hell. It has nothing to do with race; it’s all about violent crime.

Again, not so. President Ronald Reagan officially declared the current drug war in 1982, when drug crime was declining, not rising. From the outset, the war had little to do with drug crime and nearly everything to do with racial politics. The drug war was part of a grand and highly successful Republican Party strategy of using racially coded political appeals on issues of crime and welfare to attract poor and working class white voters who were resentful of, and threatened by, desegregation, busing, and affirmative action. In the words of H.R. Haldeman, President Richard Nixon’s White House Chief of Staff: “[T]he whole problem is really the blacks. The key is to devise a system that recognizes this while not appearing to.”

A few years after the drug war was announced, crack cocaine hit the streets of inner-city communities. The Reagan administration seized on this development with glee, hiring staff who were to be responsible for publicizing inner-city crack babies, crack mothers, crack whores, and drug-related violence. The goal was to make inner-city crack abuse and violence a media sensation, bolstering public support for the drug war which, it was hoped, would lead Congress to devote millions of dollars in additional funding to it.

The plan worked like a charm. For more than a decade, black drug dealers and users would be regulars in newspaper stories and would saturate the evening TV news. Congress and state legislatures nationwide would devote billions of dollars to the drug war and pass harsh mandatory minimum sentences for drug crimes — sentences longer than murderers receive in many countries.

Democrats began competing with Republicans to prove that they could be even tougher on the dark-skinned pariahs. In President Bill Clinton’s boastful words, “I can be nicked a lot, but no one can say I’m soft on crime.” The facts bear him out. Clinton’s “tough on crime” policies resulted in the largest increase in federal and state prison inmates of any president in American history. But Clinton was not satisfied with exploding prison populations. He and the “New Democrats” championed legislation banning drug felons from public housing (no matter how minor the offense) and denying them basic public benefits, including food stamps, for life. Discrimination in virtually every aspect of political, economic, and social life is now perfectly legal, if you’ve been labeled a felon.

Facing Facts

But what about all those violent criminals and drug kingpins? Isn’t the drug war waged in ghetto communities because that’s where the violent offenders can be found? The answer is yes… in made-for-TV movies. In real life, the answer is no.
The drug war has never been focused on rooting out drug kingpins or violent offenders. Federal funding flows to those agencies that increase dramatically the volume of drug arrests, not the agencies most successful in bringing down the bosses. What gets rewarded in this war is sheer numbers of drug arrests. To make matters worse, federal drug forfeiture laws allow state and local law enforcement agencies to keep for their own use 80% of the cash, cars, and homes seized from drug suspects, thus granting law enforcement a direct monetary interest in the profitability of the drug market.

The results have been predictable: people of color rounded up en masse for relatively minor, non-violent drug offenses. In 2005, four out of five drug arrests were for possession, only one out of five for sales. Most people in state prison have no history of violence or even of significant selling activity. In fact, during the 1990s — the period of the most dramatic expansion of the drug war — nearly 80% of the increase in drug arrests was for marijuana possession, a drug generally considered less harmful than alcohol or tobacco and at least as prevalent in middle-class white communities as in the inner city.

In this way, a new racial undercaste has been created in an astonishingly short period of time — a new Jim Crow system. Millions of people of color are now saddled with criminal records and legally denied the very rights that their parents and grandparents fought for and, in some cases, died for.

Affirmative action, though, has put a happy face on this racial reality. Seeing black people graduate from Harvard and Yale and become CEOs or corporate lawyers — not to mention president of the United States — causes us all to marvel at what a long way we’ve come.

Recent data shows, though, that much of black progress is a myth. In many respects, African Americans are doing no better than they were when Martin Luther King, Jr. was assassinated and uprisings swept inner cities across America. Nearly a quarter of African Americans live below the poverty line today, approximately the same percentage as in 1968. The black child poverty rate is actually higher now than it was then. Unemployment rates in black communities rival those in Third World countries. And that’s with affirmative action!

When we pull back the curtain and take a look at what our “colorblind” society creates without affirmative action, we see a familiar social, political, and economic structure — the structure of racial caste. The entrance into this new caste system can be found at the prison gate.

This is not Martin Luther King, Jr.’s dream. This is not the promised land. The cyclical rebirth of caste in America is a recurring racial nightmare.

Michelle Alexander in Pasadena March 23

Michelle Alexander

Civil rights lawyer, activist, professor, and national news commentator, Michelle Alexander has written a powerful new book arguing that the mass imprisonment of poor black and brown men and women is the most dramatic form of racial injustice in the United States today. She places this mass incarceration within 400 years of racist government policies and discusses what must be done to eliminate it.

Republished with the author’s permission from Huffington Post.

Comments

  1. James says

    You’re forgetting the fact that everyone who commits a felony is given the same treatment. The choice to commit a crime is yours and yours alone. It is no one’s fault but your own if you break the law and justice will be served. Ignorance of the law is not an excuse, so why would poverty be as such?

    The reason that a white child is statistically more likely to not go to jail for a drug related offense is because, statistically, they come from a better home environment and the parents take responsibility for the child. If the parent is out working 3 jobs and there’s no father figure in the picture, the child is left to do as they please. They are free to partake in the criminal activity again. I do not see the flaw in the logic here. If it were statistically the other way around, I would still not see any problem with the logic.

    You have got to stop blaming the situation and start realizing that personal responsibility is a necessary provision of freedom and all men, and women, will be held accountable to that.

    Furthermore, the assumption and blatant defacing assertion that all republicans are simply black hating racists that are perpetually trying to keep the black man down is offensive and sickening. You should be ashamed of yourself. With your educational level, you should know better than to think that way.

    This entire article is a blatant attack on White America. You are a sad excuse for an American and I cannot believe that I have just read this filth.

    If you’ve been labeled a felon, you have GIVEN UP your rights. No one FORCED you to do something. The proverbial or actual holding a gun to someones head is also no excuse. Principals are higher than any criminal could understand and the spineless giving into threats is no excuse. Any injury that comes of a refusal to give into a threat is not the fault of the threatened, but that of the one issuing and carrying out the threat.

    Maybe you should look at other causes – entitlement programs, medicare, social security, and the like – rather than just looking at something and seeing what you want to see. There was no direct correlation with any facts that you presented other than crime results in incarceration and loss of rights. The disparity that you have noted in black verses white neighborhoods is not what you see. It is impoverished versus middle and upper class neighborhoods. The parallel disparity of blacks in poverty versus whites in poverty is a direct result of dependency on the government stemming back to the days of Franklin D. Roosevelt.

    Please, wake up and smell reality. Stop trying to start a race war like Brown’s Revolt. Don’t give credence to the bigots and racists who believe that blacks and whites cannot live together in peace. Please work to fix problems in society instead of putting a “racism” sticker on everything you see.

    • says

      Did you read this article? It sounds like you just skimmed it and launched into your pre=prepared talking point rant. The point made here is that because of cultural byist and media sensationalism, minorities get pulled over more, searched more, investigated much more than anyone else. This leads to a much higher number of minority defendants. At which stage, judges are handing out severely harsher sentences and state attorneys offering much less favorable plea bargains. She’s saying suburban drug offenders are receiving treatment, probation and having records expunged while inner-city drug offenders are getting felonies and decades in prison. Nobody in this article states that “Republicans hate blacks” that’s a conclusion you reached on your own. The article does bring attention to the Southern Strategy and how it has been executed by the Justice Department. As a rule, Republicans don’t “hate” minorities. But they do want to win elections. And are aware that minorities and low-wage earners statistically don’t vote Republican. Therefore politics is influencing cultural byist which in turn has major consequences on the lives of real US citizens. In fact the rant above regurgitates numerous key politically motivated cultural byists that I am talking about. Obviously, you and I are not going to reach common ground anytime soon. For you to sincerely believe medicare and social security are root causes of poverty and justice inequality indicates a very deep commitment to promoting a very old, yet sophisticated political agenda, which I am certainly not going to shake in the comments section of this website.

      • GravityChanges says

        I agree with you and couldn’t have written a better response. For my own OCD I wished to give an off-topic comment though: I believe the word you are looking for is bias, not byist.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *