Bet on Barbara Boxer in November

Senator Barbara Boxer

Gambling on political races is illegal in California, but if you find yourself in Las Vegas and are looking for a surefire (legal) bet, consider putting some cash on California Senator Barbara Boxer winning re-election in November. The odds could be quite good. After all, the election year drumbeat that Boxer is in trouble has already begun, with even the March 2 New York Times declaring in a headline story that “early polls” show that Boxer is “showing signs of vulnerability.”

The article never identifies these polls, but they are probably the same ones that had Boxer on the ropes against Matt Fong in 1998 (she won by 10%) and on life support against “moderate” Bill Jones in 2004 (she won by 20%). A traditional media that reveres corporate-owned “centrists” like John McCain and Evan Bayh has trouble understanding why an outspoken progressive like Boxer keeps piling up big election wins — and will do so again this fall.

If it’s early in a Barbara Boxer re-election year, then you can count on stories arguing that the popular incumbent is in “trouble.” Those who argue that theUnited States is a “center right country” have difficulty accepting that Boxer is popular precisely because she has not betrayed her progressive principles.

Boxer Maintains Her Base
The Democrats likely to face troubles this fall are those that have generated little enthusiasm, if not outright hostility, from the Party’s core base. In contrast, Barbara Boxer retains the strong loyalty of environmentalists, labor unions, women, Latinos, and the other key Democratic constituencies.

Tom Campbell

While the New York Times states that the California G.O.P. “Smells Democratic Blood,” these same feelings were expressed in the 2000, 2004, and 2008 presidential races, and in virtually every recent statewide election that has seen California Republican candidates fail miserably. Republican Governor Schwarzenegger’s approval ratings are lower than that of former President George W. Bush, which shows that as unpopular as Democrats are in the state, Republicans are less so.

Boxer’s base will be highly motivated to keep her in office, and she will wage the type of spirited campaigns that she has conducted since winning a seat on the Marin County Board of Supervisors in 1976. I met Boxer during her 1982 congressional primary campaign, and she was a bundle of energy then and remains so today.

As for Boxer’s age, she is younger than Jerry Brown, who will top the California Democratic ticket in November. And the two leading potential Republican opponents are both over 55, so age will not be a factor.

Carly Fiorina

Carly Fiorina and Tom Campbell
While Tea Party backer Chuck DeVore is also a candidate, the threats to Boxer’s seat come from Carly Fiorina, an extremely unpopular failed Hewlett Packard executive, and Tom Campbell, the second coming of the last GOP challenger to Boxer, former Secretary of State Bill Jones.

Boxer will so badly out-campaign Fiorina that they may have to stop the campaign prior to November and declare a technical knockout. I can just imagine all those independents rushing to back a candidate who got a huge buyout while laying off workers.

The media loves candidates like Campbell, who exhibited principles early in his career but to win higher political office has become a carbon-copy, anti-tax GOP corporate hack. Campbell thinks he can cut into Boxer’s support because he is pro-choice, but this means he will lose far more votes from Republican right-wingers who will sit out the race.

The media always promotes Republicans like Campbell or John McCain who are reactionary and corporate-owned on most issues but have a few stands that are common to Democrats. This makes them “mavericks,” and allegedly shows they can appeal to Democrats.

This might work if Boxer were a Blanche Lincoln Democrat. But she is a Democrat out of the Phil and John Burton school (she was once a congressional aide to John), and her record and campaign style will create a sharp distinction between herself and either of her opponents.

I like Boxer by 8% over Campbell, and double that over Fiorina. And if there is a Tea Party candidate in the race as well, Boxer’s victory margin could approach 2004 levels.

Randy Shaw

Republished with permission from Beyond Chron

Published by the LA Progressive on March 6, 2010
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
About Randy Shaw

Randy Shaw is the Director of San Francisco's Tenderloin Housing Clinic and the Editor-in-Chief of the online daily newspaper "Beyond Chron." He is the author of three books, "Beyond the Fields", "The Activist's Handbook", and "Reclaiming America".

Comments

  1. When you are tired of the options out there, then it’s time to vote for yourself in the next election. Democrats too liberal for you? Republican‘s too moderate for you? Or do they all just speak in ‘forked tongues’(lie)?

    The political landscape of this country is outrageously corrupt. The more money a candidate has, the better his or her chances are of getting elected. Lobbyists, big corporations and donors have more influence over election results and legislation than any group of voters. I voted for myself and you can too at http://www.voteformyself.com

Speak Your Mind

*

Visit us on Google+