Bradley Manning within Rights on Wikileaks

AssangeAs the U.S. is now an international aggressor, do Americans still owe it allegiance? If a citizen releases information about crimes the U.S. commits, can he or she be legally punished? These questions arise in connection with the arrests of Australian Julian Assange and PFC Bradley Manning, a U.S. Army intelligence analyst believed to be the source of the secret government cables published by Assange’s WikiLeaks Web site.

Thanks to the long arm of Uncle Sam, Assange is now being held under house arrest by its UK criminal co-conspirator in the Middle East wars and Manning now resides in the U.S. Marine Corps brig at Quantico, Virginia.

Although not convicted of any crime, Manning for seven months allegedly has been subjected to solitary confinement, perhaps the most diabolical punishment ever devised by American wardens. Studies of U.S. prisoners subjected to it show they suffer mental deterioration and insanity. This harsh punishment prior to any trial betrays the face of the tyrant state.

Under ordinary circumstances, the release of information labeled “secret” violates U.S. law, as intelligence specialist Manning undoubtedly knew. But if the U.S. is an aggressor state, as Germany was when Hitler invaded Poland in 1939, doesn’t that change everything? America under President George W. Bush attacked two small nations that posed no threat to it. Former United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan told BBC the US-led invasion of Iraq was “illegal.” He said it contravened the UN Charter as the attack lacked Security Council approval.

MIT Professor Noam Chomsky in his book “Imperial Ambitions,” called the U.S. invasion of Iraq as “open an act of aggression as there has been in modern history, a major war crime.” By ratifying the UN Charter the U.S. agreed to refrain “from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state…” And international law authority Francis Boyle of the University of Illinois, Champaign, called the invasion of Afghanistan “an illegal armed aggression that has created a humanitarian catastrophe” for its 22 millions. (Destroying World Order.)

And as these invasions are criminal, why shouldn’t pertinent information about them not be brought to light? Whenever has it been wrong to expose a criminal enterprise? Public-spirited citizens go to the police and FBI every day to report crimes. “Under international law,” says Boyle, professor of that subject, “citizens have a basic human right to resist the commission of international crimes by their own government, especially aggression…”

And this is what PFC Manning did. He resisted aggression by informing Americans of how their government breaks laws. The Associated Press reports Manning told an associate, “I want people to see the truth…because without information you cannot make informed decisions as a public.” America’s Founders believed that, too, and made a free press a cornerstone of the new nation.

Ann Medlock, Founder of the Giraffe Heroes Project, says, “In a perfect world, institutions would listen to their staffers when they point out errors, lapses of ethics, and outright chicanery within the organization. Then those holding power would correct those flaws. But…that hasn’t been the reality. Again and again authorities just blast away at the truthsayers rather than addressing the problems.” In a democratic society, wouldn’t the Pentagon commend Boyle for calling to attention the murder of innocent civilians and reporters by a helicopter gunship?

Webster’s defines a patriot as one who “loves, supports, and defends his or her country and its interests.” The word “defends” here is critical. The wars the U.S. is waging in the Middle East are not defensive but offensive, thus it is unpatriotic to support them. In its highest sense, patriotism means citizen opposition to a totalitarian regime, not support for it. Looking back, who do Germans today honor and revere as “patriots” during the Hitler years if not the students of the White Rose Society?

Ask yourself if those students were guilty of treason for passing out leaflets that denounced Hitler’s crimes? Hitler thought so and they were arrested, tortured and decapitated. Yet the students were only trying to reach their fellow Germans with truths Hitler tried to conceal. How different is PFC Manning’s actions from theirs? PFC Manning appears to be within his rights as any whistle-blower to divulge information that exposes U.S. crimes.

Today, the American warfare state is a tyranny that operates 800 military bases abroad (in addition to 1,000 on its own soil) and spends more for war than the next 15 nations combined. It kidnaps people off the streets around the world and dispatches them to remote prisons where they are held incognito and tortured. It is the world’s No. 1 Jailer, with tens of thousands imprisoned in the Middle East against whom no charges ever have been brought. It taps the telephones of UN officials and, as WikiLeaks disclosed, orders its diplomats to spy on their foreign counterparts. It leads the world in the sale of armaments to dictators. It violates anti-nuclear covenants and uses illegal irradiated ammunition on battlefields. It attacks small countries that have never attacked it and its CIA sows mayhem as it overthrows other countries (Iran and Chile are examples) by force and violence. President Obama’s decision not to prosecute his predecessor for making illegal wars turns the Constitution into toilet paper.

Chalmers Johnson wrote in The Sorrows of Empire, “the growth of militarism, official secrecy, and a belief that the United States is no longer bound, as the Declaration of Independence so famously puts it, by “a decent respect for the opinions of mankind” is probably irreversible. A revolution would be required to bring the Pentagon back under democratic control, or to abolish the Central Intelligence Agency…”

Sherwood RossJohnson does not advocate revolution; he means an earth-shaking change needs to occur. As revolutions involve violence and proceed by force rather than reason, in point of fact, Americans who feel obliged to restore democracy here would be better off following Dr. King’s example of exerting non-violent “soul force” to effect change. The American people have been led into wars based on lies, fictions, and secrets and should be grateful to Assange and Manning for revealing the truth of this misconduct. PFC Manning is no traitor but an American patriot. Like Julian Assange, he should be set free now.

Sherwood Ross

About Sherwood Ross

Sherwood Ross has worked as a publicist for Chicago; as a reporter for the Chicago Daily News and workplace columnist for Reuters. He has also been a media consultant to colleges, law schools, labor unions, and to the editors of more than 100 national magazines. A civil rights activist, he was News Director for the National Urban League, a talk show host at WOL Radio, Washington, D.C., and holds an award for "best spot news coverage" for Chicago radio stations for civil rights reporting. He is the author "Gruening of Alaska,"(Best Books)and several plays about Japan during World War II, including "Baron Jiro," and "Yamamoto's Decision," read at the National Press Club, where he is a member. His favorite quotations are from the Sermon on The Mount.

Comments

  1. Richard Packard says:

    Two wrongs does not make a right, PFC Bradley Manning “did” take an oath to ‘defend and protect the constitution of the United States’. His “breach” of his allegiance will be tried (military court) and he will receive “due process” unlike what I’m reading from Mr. Ross’ allegations of America’s aggression. To use terms like “International Aggressor, Totalitarian Regime” and “Warfare State” reaffirms my appreciation that we live in the greatest country ever and it allows people like Sherman Ross to express himself no matter “how unappreciative” his comments might appear. Like every government that have ever existed there is shortcomings huge and small, but to “leak” sensitive information about the government you have taken an oath to defend is treasonous to say the least. To add insult to injury, PFC Manning then collaborate with a ‘foreign national’ to “expose” U.S. sensitive information that jeopardizes hundreds if not thousands of U.S. lives and that of “others” who work with our government to ensure and secure freedom here and abroad. Although Mr. Ross’ comments in this article are a bit repulsive to me, he has the right to make them in a ‘free society’ and I will defend his right to make them. But how many people do you know without one or two skeletons in their closets? Keeping those “secrets” to themselves and casting a ‘positive’ image rather than a “true” one about their shortcomings. I make no excuses for our governments wrong doings but there is a process by which ‘those wrongs’ can be addressed, using the means that PFC Manning used to “leak” these “alledged” wrongs WAS WRONG! In reference to Mr. Sherwood Ross’ article I believe “he is wrong” also, rather than perpetuate the principles of the “founding fathers” he makes accusations and conclusions without “due process” in a court of law. Furthermore his comments only “tear apart” further our social fabric which is already being torn apart by the extremist views of the political left and right.

    • the footage Manning released was not “sensitive” in any way.it showed no secret methods of engagement,said no names and the video quality wasn’t even all that great-it looks for all the world like any cut scene in an xbox video game.however this was no game -it was innocent people

  2. If there is no accepted decent, there is only a cult controlled Dictator, country patritism versus moral character. Thank you Bradley Manning and Julian Assange. I represent one of millions who believe you both are true patriots, whereas those who have called you names that indicate freedom should not be continued for all are at the least, a miss as to what Freedom and Liberty are suppose to mean in the United Sates of America.

  3. PFC Manning took an Oath, I know it well as I took it as well.

    “I, (NAME), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God. ”

    Do you see any reference to “international Law”? How about One worlder kooks (that would be you and your ilk)? You can name off what self avowed Communists think about what our country has done, but, Nobody who matters, cares. Understand that if you can understand anything about OUR Country and it’s citizens.

    I hope you and all your comrades do “Hit the streets”, so you can finally understand how small of a minority you are, how far out there you are on the politcal spectrum, that your delusional Utopia will never exist.

    You live in a nice safe country, and curse the way it is kept that way. Oh King Of Hypocrites, you enjoy all the benefits on a daily basis, the spoils of war and your biggest show of disapproval is holding a sign or writing a blog , when you know neither will get you in trouble. I find the stregth of your conviction , dubious.

  4. garry walsh says:

    Spot on. Another point “There is no voice representing the people in your one party state (Business Man’s Party)”. The positions of the elected are determined by auction. Forget the rigged government and meaningless elections. Americans need to grow a pair and hit the streets.

Trackbacks

  1. [...] appeared in LA Progressive Magazine, republished with permission. [...]

Speak Your Mind

*

Visit us on Google+