Mayors to Obama: Bring War Dollars Home

mayors conference
Baltimore Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake speaks during an opening press conference for the 79th annual meeting of the United States Conference of Mayors in Baltimore on June 17, 2011. With her are Burnsville, Minnesota, Mayor Elizabeth Kautz, president of the Conference, and Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter. UPI/Roger L. Wollenberg

Mayor Michael A. Nutter of Philadelphia, the conference’s new vice president, said: “We don’t consider this to be a quote-unquote war resolution. We actually consider it to be an economic policy resolution.”

Nutter told NPR: “We have to at least recognize in this big, great country that we have to be able to do more than one thing at a time. We should not allow ourselves to get caught in a slightly false debate that we’re either going to support military activities, or we’re going to support cities. We can actually do both in the United States of America.”

But the reality is that the nation does have to choose between “guns” and “butter.” There are, as economists argue, trade- offs when deciding where and how to allocate scarce federal dollars. On its website, the National Priorities Project reveals the trade-offs for every city, state, and Congressional district, as well as the entire nation.

For example, the $1.8 billion that Los Angeles is sending to Iraq and Afghanistan this year could otherwise pay for 16,913 elementary school teachers, or 17,099 firefighters, or 148,237 Head Start slots for children, or 449,316 low-income people getting health care, or 155,886 scholarships for university students, or 462,138 households installing solar photovoltaic cells to save energy, or 137,282 military veterans receiving health care from the Veterans Administration.

The “guns vs. butter” debate is a longstanding one. In the 1940s, Walter Reuther, president of the United Auto Workers union, championed a plan to convert the nation’s defense factories toward civilian use after World War 2. Instead, business and political leaders put the country what some called a “permanent war economy” footing, justified by the Cold War and the arms race with the Soviet Union. As a result, the military — including weapons systems, military bases in the U.S. and overseas, and millions of American civilians and uniformed troops employed by the Pentagon — gobbled up a largest portion of the federal budget, squeezing out other priorities.

In his farewell address on January 17, 1961, President Dwight Eisenhower, a war hero, warned about the “unwarranted influence” of the “military industrial complex.” Later in the decade, President Lyndon Johnson discovered that he could not wage an effective war on poverty and a war in Vietnam at the same time. As a result, he lost both, and lost his job.

In 1967, Rev. Martin Luther King, who was a strong supporter of LBJ’s Great Society agenda, broke his silence on opposing the Vietnam war when the contradictions became too serious to ignore any longer. In a speech in Los Angeles, King said:

While the anti-poverty program is cautiously initiated, zealously supervised and evaluated for immediate results, billions are liberally expended for this ill-considered war. The recently revealed mis-estimate of the war budget amounts to ten billions of dollars for a single year. This error alone is more than five times the amount committed to anti-poverty programs. The security we profess to seek in foreign adventures we will lose in our decaying cities. The bombs in Vietnam explode at home: they destroy the hopes and possibilities for a decent America.

When the Cold War with the Soviet Union ended in the late 1980s, Americans were promised a “peace dividend.” Many military experts at the time suggested that the defense budget could be cut by one-third to one-half without undermining national security.

And what about the jobs of Americans employed by defense contractors or living in areas whose local economies depended on military bases? Like Walter Reuther had proposed in the 1940s, experts like Seymour Melman, a Columbia University professor, put forward detailed “defense conversion” plans showing how factories could be retooled and workers retrained to guarantee that they would not be harmed by the transition from a war economy to a civilian peace economy.

But the dramatic “peace dividend” never arrived. Presidents Bush, Clinton, and Bush as well as Congress refused to challenge the military industrial complex. Indeed, President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney used the “war on terror” as an excuse to increase the military budget, expand new weapons system, funnel more federal contracts to big defense contractors like Halliburton, Boeing, and Lockheed Martin, and, in the process, cut taxes for the rich and swell the federal budget deficit.

peter dreierNow the mayors of America’s cities and towns — hardly radicals — are desperately seeking federal funds to stop the hemorrhaging of jobs and services, and to maintain the nation’s aging infrastructure.

Mayor Joseph O’Brien of Worcester, Massachusetts, observed: “We are spending a billion a month after Osama bin Laden has been killed. And while I appreciate the effort to rebuild nations around the world, we have tremendous needs in communities like mine.”

Peter Dreier

Peter Dreier is professor of politics and chair of the Urban & Environmental Policy department at Occidental College in Los Angeles. His next book, The 100 Greatest Americans of the 20th Century: A Social Justice Hall of Fame, will be published by Nation Books early next year.

Republished with the author’s permission from Huffington Post

 

Published by the LA Progressive on June 23, 2011
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Pages: 1 2

About Peter Dreier

Peter Dreier teaches Politics and chairs the Urban & Environmental Policy Department at Occidental College. His most recent book is The 100 Greatest Americans of the 20th Century: A Social Justice Hall of Fame (Nation Books, 2012)

Comments

  1. As noted above that money could have long been better spent here at home! Just thank with all of the billions of dollars wasted on war while the many suffer and the very FEW BENEFIT, It’s about time that we open our eyes to finally see, I just hope that it’s not to late for the change….

Trackbacks

  1. [...] http://www.laprogressive.com/war-and-peace/bring-war-dollars-home/ This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. ← HHS and FDA Announce New Graphic Warnings for Cigarettes Michelle Obama Plays Soccer with Kids in Cape Town → [...]

Speak Your Mind

*

Visit us on Google+