Israeli Intransigence on Palestine Isolating U.S. and Israel

palestine israel angry birdsThe U.S. and Israel “now looked trapped together, weakened and dangerously isolated” during the Arab Spring over Israel’s intransigence on statehood for Palestine, an article in The New Yorker magazine observes.

“A more creative Israel would embrace Palestine’s recognition, which it has already endorsed in principle, and then rally allies to its side, to leverage their support in decisive settlement talks,” writes Steve Coll in the September 26th issue.

Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak allegedly privately told his nation’s leaders, “By sharpening tensions with the Palestinians, we are inviting isolation on Israel.”

Coll terms the case for Palestinian statehood “compelling.” “Since the 1993 Oslo Accords, Palestinian leaders have been told repeatedly that if they organized themselves peacefully and negotiated in good faith with Israel they would win statehood.”

“Their performance has often disappointed,” he continues. “Yasir Arafat eschewed a deal with Israel in 2000; Hamas has persistently launched indiscriminate attacks and broadcast anti-Semitism. Yet, under the Palestinian Authority’s sway, the West Bank now resembles a legitimate state more closely than at any time since 1967.”

Two years ago, under Prime Minister Salam Fayyad, the Palestinian Authority began to improve governance and while its security forces “still mete out abuses,” Coll writes, “Palestinian leaders have delivered on many of their pledges.” What’s more, last April the World Bank said that the Authority is “well-positioned for the establishment of a state at any point in the near future.”

Although President Obama told the UN’s General Assembly last year that renewed talks could lead to “an independent sovereign state of Palestine” real progress has gone no further than words. “Many Palestinian leaders,” Coll writes, “have therefore concluded that it may be impossible to achieve statehood through negotiations with (Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin) Netanyahu.”

“Their pessimism is well grounded,” Coll continues. “The evidence suggests that he seeks only to fob off the Palestinian Authority, as well as his allies in the United States and Europe, in order to buy more time to bankroll more settlements on the West Bank, which will change the contours of the conflict.”

Sherwood RossFar from doing it any good, Israel’s intransigence is turning once friendly nations against it. “Five years ago, Turkey was, with Egypt, Israel’s most important ally in the Muslim  world,” Coll writes. Now the Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan derides Israel as “the West’s spoiled child.”

“The loss of Turkey’s allegiance is an unnecessary calamity for Israel, one that is symptomatic of the country’s self-defeating paralysis,” Coll writes.

Sherwood Ross

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Comments

  1. Joe Weinstein says

    All Ross can say is that Coll says this and says that. Why is Mr Coll’s article supposed to be so insightful or important?

    One thing Ross doesn’t explain is his alleged topic: the so-called ‘Israeli intransigence’. Intransigent about what, exactly? It seems Israelis are called intransigent because they won’t recognize a Palestine state run by a Palestine Authority (PA) that itself is intransigent about several things: NOT recognizing Israel as a Jewish state. (But insisting that Palestine will be (1) a Moslem state, and moreover (2) will permit no Jews.) , NOT acknowledging that it will exist in peace with Israel, and that all grounds for conflict will be at end, and NOT recognizing that, because Israel took in over a million Jewish refugees from the Moslem Mideast ande North Africa, there has been a population exchange, and therefore no so-called ‘right of return’ for those Palestinians who fled in 1948 (rather than simply stay where they were, as did Israeli Arabs).
    Oh, and one other matter. Since the PA claimsto be unifying with Hamas, and Hamas denies that Israel as a nation and Jews as person have any right to exist where they are now, the Israelis have even less reason to recognize the PA’s would-be state of Palestine.

    Isolation – like conflict – does not necessarily depend very much or at all on the actions or policies of the scapegoated Israelis. No matter what the Israelis – or the Americans – actually do, they will be blamed by regimes and movements committed to scapegoating, isolating and fighting them. Like the new Islamist regime in Turkey and its likes that are now taking power elsewhere.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *