Paul Ryan’s Plan: What’s Really at Stake

paul ryan's planI was there in 1995 when the government closed because of a budget stalemate. I had to tell most of the Labor Department’s 15,600 employees to go home and not return the next day. I also had to tell them I didn’t know when they’d next get a paycheck.

There were two shutdowns, actually, rolling across the government in close succession, like thunder storms.

It’s not the way to do the public’s business.

Newt Gingrich got blamed largely because his ego was (and is) so big he couldn’t stop blabbing that Clinton should be blamed. (Gingrich’s complaint of a bad seat on Air Force One didn’t help.)

But the larger loss was to the dignity and credibility of the United States government. When average Americans saw the Speaker of the House and the President of the United States behaving like nursery school children unable to get along, it only added to the prevailing cynicism.

Cynicism about government works to the Republicans’ continued advantage.

Case in point. House Budget Chair Paul Ryan unveiled a plan that should make every American cringe. It would turn Medicare into vouchers whose benefits are funneled into the pockets of private insurers. It would make Medicaid and Food Stamps into block grants that allow states to ignore poor people altogether. It would drastically cut funding for schools, roads, and much else Americans need. And many of the plan’s savings would go to wealthy Americans who’d pay even lower taxes than they do today.

Ryan’s plan has no chance of passage – as long as Democrats are still in control of the Senate (even Democratic deficit hawks like Kent Conrad and Ben Nelson are appalled by it) and the White House.

But this so-called “blueprint” could be a blueprint for America’s future when and if right-wing Republicans take charge.

Which is where the cynicism comes in – and the shutdowns. Republicans may get blamed now. But if the shutdowns contribute to the belief among Americans that government doesn’t work, Republicans win over the long term. As with the rise of the Tea Partiers, the initiative shifts to those who essentially want to close it down for good.

That’s why it’s so important that the President have something more to say to the American people than “I want to cut spending, too, but the Republican cuts go too far.” The “going too far” argument is no match for a worldview that says government is the central problem to begin with.

Obama must show America that the basic choice is between two fundamental views of this nation. Either we’re all in this together, or we’re a bunch of individuals who happen to live within these borders and are mainly on their own.

This has been the basic choice all along — when the Founding Fathers wrote the Constitution, in the Civil War, when we went through World War I and World War II and the Great Depression in between, during the Civil Rights movement and beyond.

Robert ReichThe President needs to remind us that as members of the same society we have obligations to one another — that the wealthiest among us must pay their fair share of taxes, that any of us who loses our jobs or homes or gets terribly sick can count on the rest of us, and that we have collective obligations to our elderly, our children, and the rest of the planet.

This is why we have government. And anyone who wants to shut it down or cut it down because they say we can’t afford it any longer is plain wrong. We are the richest nation in the world, richer than we’ve ever been. We can afford to remain a society whose members are in it together.

Robert Reich
Robert Reich’s Blog

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Comments

  1. pigdog67 says

    Hi Robert
    A good point. Obama should not have agreed to the tax cuts. He emboldened them.
    I am an upper middle class person with 2 small children and a homemaker wife. I paid a lot of taxes last year. I pay for my own health care (cash) as I do not believe in paying corrupt insurance company.
    I do not like the Republicans. They offer me nothing.
    But Obama has done nothing for me either.
    He needed to get out of Iraq (completely), get out of Afghanistan (completely), bring in universal health insurance (single payer) it works everyone in the world knows that outside of America.
    This country is bankrupt. You cannot be rich and be bankrupt they are mutually exclusive.
    To become solvent the plan is simple.
    Cut military spending by 90% (have defensive military), get rid of Medicare (this will lower healthcare costs by 50%), this has been proven by sound economic theory, bring in single payer, cap doctors salaries (let them quit if they want), provide free medical education to people who want to be doctors and are smart, cap healthcare lawsuits, place limits on law schools (how many they can graduate) , make social security solvent by actually investing the money and not spending it on other things, and privatize education (Stanford is private and a great university, it can be done well). Get people to donate to education, they donate to the churches, a change in thought is required so they donate considerably to education. Education can be funded via donations.

  2. in_awe says

    Once again the professor nicely avoids mentioning the 10 year debt curve of the Obama budget. Reich essentially believes in a variation of the underwear bandits theory of success:

    Step 1: Borrow and Spend without restraint; raise Debt/GDP to stunning levels; ignore entitlements
    Step 2: ??????
    Step 3: Everything is better

    Brilliant reality based analysis by Reich. He might as well fill in the details of Step 2: unicorns and magic fairy dust.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *