Hector Aristizábal lay on a table in Medellín, Colombia, his head covered with a black cloth. Twenty-eight years had passed since he was taken from his home by the US-trained military, secretly detained and tortured. Now he had returned to his birthplace after years in exile in the US to spend a month working with peace and justice groups and this night he was not in custody but onstage.
“Nightwind”–the play we created in 2004 about his experience and his brother’s abduction, torture, and murder by a death squad–has toured the US and the world, including Afghanistan, to raise global opposition to the practice of torture. Performing it for the first time in Medellín, the city where the atrocities took place, Hector was nervous. He worried about the effect on the audience, people who had experienced these horrors firsthand, but as he lay with his eyes covered, unable to see, he also felt vulnerable.
Every day in Colombia, twenty people are disappeared. Massacres continue as do rightwing paramilitary links to the Army and to high government officials and to the cocaine trade. Anyone could be in the audience–members of the military or paramilitary that go on killing with impunity and any one of them might decide, “This guy thinks he’s going to survive again. Not this time. Let’s finish the job.” Hector believed for the moment he was going to die.
While Hector was sweating it out onstage, I was back in Los Angeles and I was worried, too, because I was reading the text of Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, in which the Supreme Court on June 24 decided that training people in nonviolent conflict resolution and international human rights law can lead to 15 years in a federal prison for providing material support to a foreign terrorist organization.
The case was brought because retired administrative law judge Ralph Fertig wanted to be sure he wouldn’t be prosecuted under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 and the later provisions of the Patriot Act for continuing his longstanding work in nonviolence with the Kurdish Workers Party (PKK) and in helping that group prepare a case to bring to the United Nations. The Carter Center joined with an amicus brief as much of Jimmy Carter’s work in monitoring elections and entering conflict zones could be ruled criminal. Court after court agreed Judge Fertig’s work was legitimate and protected but the Obama administration appealed, with Elena Kagan (then Solicitor-General) offering the argument.
The Roberts court once more managed to ignore the Constitution and at the same time overreach. According to Judge Fertig who spoke to the American Civil Liberties Union in Santa Monica in July, the Chief Justice chastised Kagan for not arguing the case strenuously enough. The decision went even further than the government’s argument sought in its chilling effect on free association and speech.
In Medellín, I guess it is material support for terrorism when to enter the poorest, most marginalized neighborhoods bus drivers and taxi drivers are forced to pay a “vacuna”–vaccination against getting killed–to the illegal paramilitaries who seek to control who gets in and who gets out alive. Thanks to the Supreme Court, zones where peacemaking is most needed are now off-limits. Will this affect aid workers who may cross paths with the Taliban in flood-ravaged Pakistan? As Ahilan Arulanantham, director of immigrant rights and national security for the ACLU of Southern California, has pointed out, if the decision in Holder v. HLP had come down in 2004, the provision of disaster relief to tsunami-devastated civilians in the Tamil Tiger-controlled region of Sri Lanka would have been a crime.
I sat with the decision in my hands and thought about Rep. Keith Ellison of Minnesota who intends to introduce a legislative fix and will no doubt endure a continuation of the personal attacks on him and his Muslim faith.
I thought a good argument can be made (by me, not by the Roberts court) that the US government’s real fear is not of terrorists but of the “interference” of citizen diplomacy and humanitarian NGOs that provide alternatives to the default military response in conflict zones.
I thought that as a US taxpayer, I’ve provided material support to State-sponsored terrorism and torture.
I thought of the “Nightwind” performance and discussion Hector and I offered in Los Angeles at a mosque that has been under attack (including a foiled plot to bomb it) because it was built with Saudi support and two of the 9/11 hijackers at one time worshipped there. Were there any radical Islamists present? I doubt it, but I rather hope so. What a perfect audience for us to reach with a play that shows a torture survivor ultimately refusing the option of violence.
I thought of the work Hector has done on the West Bank to bring Israeli rabbinical students and Palestinian activists together. Did he first screen the participants to make sure there was no link to Hamas? I don’t think so.
I thought about how tired I am of hearing the Palestinian people blamed for not having produced a Martin Luther King, Jr. or a Gandhi. In 1983, clinical psychologist Mubarak Awad established the Palestinian Center for the Study of Nonviolence. Five years later, when his work training people in the philosophy and practice of nonviolent civil disobedience was having an effect and showing success, an alarmed Israeli government had him deported from the Occupied Territories. Only this week, an Israeli military court convicted Abdallah Abu Rahma, the coordinator of the Popular Committee against the Wall and Settlements in Bil’in, for his nonviolent resistance.
Meanwhile in Medellín, the performance continued as Hector carried the audience with him through his pain, his desire for violent revenge, and his transformation of that passion and energy into the commitment to work peacefully for justice.
The performance ended, but not the experience. Trained as a psychologist as well as an actor and director, Hector had audience members join him in a workshop he designed to allow them to express their emotions and release pain. People cried, screamed, remembered friends and family members who had been killed or disappeared.
“We need this,” said one of the event organizers. “All of us need healing but the programs we have here now bring together paramilitaries (from the AUC, designated by the US a foreign terrorist organization) and guerrillas (including from the FARC, designated by the US as a foreign terrorist organization) and we ask people to tell their terrible stories. Then everyone goes home devastated. They go home alone.”
If you reopen the wound, you have to offer medicine. We want to return to Colombia next year to offer medicine, but if we do that, are we facing criminal prosecution when we return home?
I guess governments have figured out it’s easy to justify violence against a violent opponent, and a terrorist is therefore the preferred adversary. Especially when the terrorist is the non-person we must treat as radioactive and never talk to.
To governments like our own in thrall to the military-industrial complex and the illusion of military victory and the desire for top-down control, there’s a reason nonviolent mass movements pose a threat: They work.
Diane Lefer’s new book, The Blessing Next to the Wound, has just been published. Co-authored with Hector Aristizábal, it is a true story of surviving torture and civil war and seeking change (including change in how we treat our youth) through action.