Stop Calling Republicans ‘Hypocrites’

bristol and sarah palinIt’s not that Republicans aren’t hypocrites – it’s more the label just isn’t an effective dig. First, hypocrite is a fancy foreign Greek word like amnesty, ethics or Europe – how is that going to appeal to Republicans? Second, espousing virtues you don’t personally have to live up to is basically the point of being a Republican.

Talker Rush Limbaugh, speaker for Republicans everywhere, famously railed against drug users and called for harsher sentencing for possession when it was fashionable in the ‘90s. Then in 2006 Limbaugh was arrested and went to rehab after losing his hearing as a direct result of his long-term drug addiction. Needless to say, he’s cool with hypocrisy. He even thinks hypocrisy is a good thing.

During South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford’s “Appalachian Trail” love affair last year, Limbaugh defended the Republican politician, telling his audience, “Hypocrisy shows that there are moral values in a culture. Without moral values in a culture it would not be possible for anyone to be a hypocrite.”

Yes, according to self-proclaimed personal responsibility advocate Rush Limbaugh, personal choice doesn’t make you a hypocrite – society does.

Calling a conservative “hypocrite” is like calling a progressive “liberal”: It stings, but they don’t actually understand why it’s supposed to be offensive. The GOP doesn’t see self-contradiction as a moral shortcoming. They see people who don’t agree with them as a moral shortcoming.

Take closeted homosexual GOP lawmakers who stand with their party and vote against gay rights. I’d list them all by name but I have a word count limit and it’s widespread (er stance) enough to be a cliché. Does it really hurt them to be called hypocrites? No.

Take the canard that Republicans are somehow FOR the government getting out of our lives. That’s unless we look like we could be Mexican, or we’re a woman of childbearing capability. Then it’s the government’s job – responsibility – to get up in our business. Is it effective to call them hypocrites? No.

Take Fraction Governor Sarah Palin who spends her free time telling President Obama how to do his job after she quit hers during the greatest economic downturn her state has ever faced. Not to mention her daughter, the unwed teenage mother Bristol Palin, who is now a paid advocate for abstinence. Do they care if they’re called hypocrites? No.

Fox News rails against the “mainstream media” while bragging about their high ratings and now their front row seat in the White House press briefing room. Republican leadership castigates Democrats for high unemployment rates while stalling the jobs bill. Not to mention Republicans floating the myth that the biggest donor to the Obama campaign was BP when the bumper sticker/rallying cry of the 2008 RNC was “Drill, Baby, Drill.” Does calling them hypocrites somehow stop this? No. Does it make them consider these positions to be flawed? This is about national security! Do you hate America?

No, using the word “hypocrite” should really be stopped altogether. It’s become a meaningless insult like “Nazi,” “bias,” or “environmentalist.” It actually has some spray back onto its user anyway. Basically pointing out someone is a hypocrite makes you sound like an angsty emo tween. It’s a word we learn in junior high to apply to grownups.

Instead of “hypocrite” I recommend the word “fraud.” It sounds bad. Fraud is illegal. Fraud is immoral. And it’s an accurate way of describing hypocrisy without sounding like an irate Justin Bieber fan.

Plus, we’re faced with a GOP who have appointed themselves as deficit hawks, but who are now for renewing the Bush Tax Cuts. These tax cuts added to (wait for it) the deficit – that’s why they’re going to expire. The only way the original bill could pass through reconciliation was for the Congressional Budget Office to have it expire in ten years.

Will renewing these tax cuts add to the deficit? Just a couple of trillion dollars. Former Chairman of the Federal Reserve Alan Greenspan was asked on Meet the Press this week if he agrees with Republican leaders who say that tax cuts pay for themselves. His answer? A curt, “No, I do not.”

What does that mean? It means Republicans are FRAUDS when it comes to being deficit hawks.

See how easy that was?<

Tina Dupuy

Reposted with permission.

Published by the LA Progressive on August 5, 2010
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
About Tina Dupuy

Tina is a nationally syndicated political columnist, investigative journalist, award-winning writer, stand-up comic and wedge issue fan.

Comments

  1. Good article Tina. I just wonder what we can do about our own side’s hypocrisy. For instance:

    Not to mention Republicans floating the myth that the biggest donor to the Obama campaign was BP when the bumper sticker/rallying cry of the 2008 RNC was “Drill, Baby, Drill.”

    In my mind, the problem isn’t so much that Repubs pushed “Drill, Baby, Drill,” it’s that our President, our Change Agent, our hero first black president of the United States not only took huge amounts of money from companies like BP, but is now beholden to that company, along with numerous others.

    Hundreds of thousands of us thought electing Barack Obama would be a way to reclaim our government and put it back in the hands of “the people.” What suckers we were. You expect the Repubs to steal from the middle class and give to the rich.

    Isn’t it so much more painful when our own guy does it?

  2. Marshall says:

    Look at all the examples Tina used, if she was just having fun why were the examples all of GOP bums and no dem bums??

  3. Tina’s piece is just plain fun – and, as she notes, in everyday life it’s often simpler, more understandable and more biting to call someone a ‘fraud’ rather than a ‘hypocrite’.

    Contra Roger’s claim, Tina is NOT complaining about someone actually being a hypocrite. Rather, she ‘complains’ (if you like) that using the term ‘hypocrite’ is less effective than using the near-synonym ‘fraud’. Also contra Roger’s post, when you call someone a ‘fraud’ or a ‘hypocrite’ (or some other derogatory term) you aren’t necessarily just playing a blame or name or emotion game. People truly can be frauds, and sometimes this fact is important. A respect for cogent truth sometimes requires pointing out cases of fraud.

    One such case became evident in my mail today, in a would-be fund-raising message by and for a local Republican congressional candidate (Star Parker, CD 37).

    She claimed to be for personal ‘responsibility’, and ‘conservative beliefs’, as versus a ‘corrupt’ opponent.

    But her opening-line claim was that her opponent supports ‘the death panels of Obama Care’. ‘Death panels’ yet again?? So much for the basic old-time CONSERVATIVE BELIEF in the importance of speaking truth rather than fantasy, so much for RESPONSIBILITY to proclaim rather than CORRUPT the truth.

    • Marshall says:

      This is proof of anything goes when seeking votes. It is that time of the year and my mail has lots of flyers to vote for smith not brown and all the reason why brown is a crook. So why is it again that only presidents have term limits??

  4. Marshall says:

    Lot of truth in what Roger writes. Consider how many hypocrites vogel kopf wrote about and nar a one was a demoncract. Is that not being just what you wrote about? so you become the biggest hypocrite of all.

  5. Don’t know why you complain about some one being a hypocrite. At some point we have all partaken in actions that were contrary to what we expound. If this was not true than all those of us who call ourselves Democrats would have no problem with anything or anyone. The only difference is that we have a propensity to hide those errors best as possible as if to show the world that we are perfect people. If you are going to criticize some one, would it not be better to academically point out deficiency rather than play the same Emotion games that certain individuals tend to use to further their success? The only thing we can gain by including ourselves in name calling games is entrench the practice of making political decisions based on emotions.

Speak Your Mind

*

Visit us on Google+