Straight Talk About the GOP Budget

cantor and boehnerWhen it comes to the economy, the White House is talking tough to the Republicans … about the debt ceiling. It’s true that the threat to shut down the government by refusing to honor its debt obligations is downright un-American. The Administration’s right to call them out for that. But there’s a larger question: Who’s going to give the American people some straight talk about the GOP’s economic ideas?

Forget the debt ceiling for a moment, if you can. Forget the GOP’s attempt to shut down the government over the Affordable Care Act. Who is going to explain to the American people how profoundly misguided, and even immoral, the Republicans’ entire economic agenda has become?

Granted, it’s a big job. First, there’s the House’s underhanded “continuing resolution,” which freezes in place “sequestration” cuts that are $70 billion below the figure which both parties agreed to in prior negotiations. Apparently trustworthiness is not a strong trait among today’s Republicans.

Then there’s the wanton cruelty in this budget: The cuts to the TRIO program which helps poor Americans get a higher education and better themselves. Reductions in the SNAP program for hungry Americans, which provides the average recipient with $133 per month in assistance.

Sen. Bernie Sanders lists some of the effects of sequester-based cuts: 57,000 children losing access to Head Start programs. Tens of thousands of seniors dropped from Meals on Wheels. Cuts to housing assistance for the elderly, disabled, and others that will affect 147,000 households. 70,000 college students without a work-study program. Cancer patients losing Medicare-financed treatments. Roughly 400,000 elderly and other low-income households losing heating assistance during the upcoming winter months.

If the GOP’s Continuing Resolution is adopted, more cuts will follow: Head Start and the heating-assistance program will suffer further cuts. Education funds for low-income children and the disabled will be slashed. Not that the Republicans are entirely ungenerous: Their plan increases spending for defense by $20 billion, most of which will wind up in the pockets of wealthy defense contractors.

u6 That’s the cruelty in the Republican economic plan. Then there’s the stupidity. The Congressional Budget Office has already estimated that sequestration cuts will cost the economy 900,000 jobs and shrink our national economy by 0.7 percent.

For reference, that’s 900,000 jobs out of an economy that’s in desperate need of more, not, less employment. We’re far from a recovery when it comes to unemployment in this country:

And that’s 0.7 percent out of an economy that, with some wise stewardship, might grow instead — and in a way that boosts income for the 99 percent, not just the wealthiest among us:

When it comes to the deficit Republicans should be declaring victory, not calling for more spending cuts. After all, the deficit is plummeting:

The problem is, it’s falling too fast. Lost jobs and lost wages add up to a shrinking economy.

income-levelsThe President and his staff are certainly taking a firmer stance on the negotiation process. Gene Sperling, head of the President’s Council of Economic Advisors, told reporters this weekend that President Obama “is not going to negotiate over whether we should be paying our bills.”

And Ezra Klein, a reliable reflector of White House moods, said this on MSNBC: “The White House has complete religion on the debt ceiling… This White House does not want their legacy to be (that) they set in motion the chain of events that led to America’s role as an economic corner stone of the world being degraded.”

But those objections are about process, not economic policy. On the fiscal front, the White House is boasting about deficit reduction instead of focusing on the case for urgently-needed spending. And even as Boehner raises the stakes with his Continuing Resolution, both the Senate and White House budget proposals hew faithfully to the stark and austere budget cuts agreed upon in the last round of negotiations.

If the Democrats stick to that approach, once again they’ll be negotiating against themselves.

budget-deficitThey’re right to oppose Boehner’s attempt to extend the sequestration cuts. But the President is only intermittently making the case for the increased government investment – in infrastructure, education, and other job-creating programs – that’s necessary to get this economy back on track. He should drop the deficit boasting, which only reinforces the right’s flawed logic, and stick to discussing the additional spending this country so urgently needs.

When it comes to economic substance, rather than legislative process, this still tends to be a one-sided conversation. The conservative monologue is not being met with a singular, clear counter-argument based on economic common sense.

Sure, they’ll all have to try to work out an agreement at some point. But before they do that, Democrats should take a tip from Tip O’Neill. The President’s team loves to celebrate the former Democratic Speaker for “having a beer” with President Ronald Reagan and working through tough fiscal issues with the conservative icon.

rj eskowBut O’Neill always began by making it clear where he and his party stood, and how deeply they disagreed with Reagan and the Republicans.  He wasn’t afraid to describe Reagan as “a cheerleader for selfishness” or to pronounce his budget proposals “dead on arrival.”

If Reagan was a cheerleader for selfishness, Boehner & Company are pit bulls for it. They need to be opposed forcefully, in plain and direct language. Before the deal-making begins, the American people deserve a little truth-telling.

It’s good to hear the President and his party explain why the legislative process must be protected from Republican extremism. It’s time for them to do the same thing for the economy.

Richard Eskow
Huffington Post

Friday, 20 September 2013

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Comments

  1. JoeWeinstein says

    Of course the usual well-intended advice to Democrats – and in particular to the likes of Obama – will be wasted breath. These DINOs ultimately WANT to lose the economic argument so that they have an excuse for ‘compromise’.

    By the way all sorts of folks whine ‘worker shortage’. For relatively unskilled work, the employers whine: they would like more workers around to compete against one another for jobs, so that wage scales can be driven lower. Less appreciated, for skilled and even professional work the whiners include the deans of professional schools: they want both to justify their programs (to governments) so as to attract more subsidies, and to promote (to opportunist students) enrollment in their programs as a good-job pathway. So we will always here talk of teacher shortages, engineer shortages, scientist shortages, etc. Such talk is a lot easier than paying respectable salaries – or even just plain respect, never mind bigger salaries – to teachers, engineers, and scientists.

  2. George Hubert says

    The underlying dynamic behind immigration reform and a living wage for agricultural workers hinges on U.S. food policy, which keeps food relatively cheap. Cheap food depends on subsidies for agricultural commodities but also requires consensus between the two parties to obstruct meaningful immigration reform. If immigrants had legal status, they could organize and then the costs of labor and food would rise. Neither party would ever allow this to happen and risk repeating the Bracero program termination mistake that ushered in the UFW. Until Americans pay a fair price for the cost of food, progressive immigration legislation is an impossible dream. And any immigration reform initiative, like the current one, will always be a joke.

  3. -Nate says

    You want the rich agri growers to care about a ” bunch of beaners “? .
    Seriously ? . why, theyre almost animals , just look at how they like to live ! (never mind they’re forced to live in squalor by those same agri growers who are complaining .)
    The fun will really begin when all the complacent Americans who don’t care about the Farm Workers and Janitors and so allow the gop Union busting to continue , in time they’ll come after your cushy Middle Class job and you’ll be whining when this is all _YOUR_FAULT_ for not standing up NOW for all Workers rights .
    -Nate

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *