Swedish Justice on Trial in WikiLeaks Case

wikileaks julian assangeSweden’s issuing of arrest warrants for Julian Assange yesterday seems designed to further defame the WikiLeaks whistleblower whose network has released embarrassing secret documents on the Afghanistan and Iraq wars. The charges may increase pressure on mainstream news organizations to cease cooperating with WikiLeaks in the further disclosure of thousands of documents that have not yet been released.

The silencing of WikiLeaks will deny people around the world, including the American people, vital information about secret operations by US forces, which have resulted in higher civilian casualties than previously reported.

New developments in the case raises troubling questions, among them:

  • What the New York Times account calls a “baffling on-again-off-again process that featured disagreements among prosecutors” over whether to arrest Julian Assange [NYT, Nov. 19].
  • Whether it is only coincidental that the warrants were issued on the eve of the NATO meeting in Lisbon.

After Sweden’s recent national elections, which brought to power a center-right coalition, the Swedish state is becoming a satellite of the Pentagon and US intelligence agencies, and seeks a closer relationship with NATO.

Gone apparently is the era when the Swedish government stood up to the Great Powers as an independent sanctuary for freedom and dissent. A government, one which under Olaf Palme would have protected Julian Assange, has been replaced by a regime that functions as a virtual arm of the Pentagon. In October, the Swedish immigration board rejected Assange’s application for residence, which might have protected WikiLeaks’ servers from possible suppression, and now Sweden’s prosecutors seek to arrest him for “questioning”.
We soon may see the spectacle of Julian Assange in shackles, a sight which might cause orgasms among his enemies. The speculation is not far-fetched. In Iraq, Derek Harvey, the lead Defense Intelligence Agency adviser to Gen. David Petraeus, said that secret assassinations gave him orgasms. [Woodward, The War Within, 2008, p. 380]

The trial of Julian Assange, if it ever takes place, may provide a window to defend himself before the eyes of the world. The state will attempt to narrow the evidence to such matters as broken condoms, while the defense maintains that Assange is innocent and being persecuted.

tom haydenThe driving force in this case is a separate office created by the Pentagon where hundreds of high-tech information warriors work around the clock to contain or suppress the WikiLeaks underground from further leaks. At the same time, a US Justice task force is considering charges of espionage, which would require extradition and trial in the United States.

A network of whistleblowers in the US, including Daniel Ellsberg, and noted civil liberties firms, are exploring ways to defend Assange against extradition.

But the first line of defense will likely be in Sweden, where the state’s core identity could be on trial.

Tom Hayden

Tom Hayden is the author of 17 books, a former California state senator and a longtime peace activist.

Republished with the author’s permission.

Comments

  1. says

    If you believe in total openness on all information, tell me your home address, phone number, mother’s maiden name, credit card number, social security number [if you have one], the name of your favorite pet, and your date of birth. I will show you all the journalistic integrity Assange did by publishing it all over the Net. You will get the same redaction as 77,000 Afghans did that are now at risk.

  2. Harald Nordius says

    I’m sad to say, Mr Hayden has got the facts wrong. The Swedish Justice needs reform, that’s correct, and we need help from the outside to get it right, but the helpers need to get their facts right.

    The present state of the Swedish Justice when dealing with sexual matters is not the work of the present government. It’s the work of the previous social democratic government. Pursuing a feminist agenda it established a practice where a man accused of rape has little hope unless the woman’s story is completely incredible. The attorney of the women in this case, Claes Borgström, is a member of the Social Democrats and was as an “Ombudsman for gender equality” very active in this. His law firm partner, Thomas Bodström, was Minister of Justice in the social democratic government. Mr Borgström was the one that requested the case be reopened. The new prosecutor assigned to this, Marianne Ny, also has close ties to these circles.

    When it comes to human rights issues, the Social Democrats’ record is rather stained too. In fact, Mr Bodström as Minister of Justice, was very active in furthering the European Data Retention Directive and other human rights threatening legislation. In Sweden “Bodström society” has become a synonym to “Big Brother society”.

    We also need to make a separation between Mr Assange’s personal life and WikiLeaks. Even if the worst happens and he is convicted, WikiLeak can continue and it still may be proteced by the Swedish laws protecting the freedom of speech and the freedom of the press. Despite all they are still very strong and, more important, there are people prepared to defend them. Especially important in this case is that we have an isp, which defends the freedom of the Internet, dares to defy the authorities and doesn’t give in to pressure. This isp is hosting WikiLeaks on servers placed in “a nuke safe bunker”.

    Hopefully, the end of all this is that Mr Assange walks and Sweden is brought before the Europan Court of Human Rights.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *