Pak Border Post Attack a Big Loss for U.S. War Policy

Pakistanis burn an American flag in protest of NATO border strike. AFP PHOTO/ S.S. MIRZA

Gareth Porter: The decision to attack by helicopter gunships, which killed 24 Pakistani troops and stoked a new level of anti-U.S. sentiment feeling in the country, has caught the U.S.-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in Afghanistan in a rare defense posture, because senior officials don’t know what happened and why.

Obama’s Disappointing Peace Plan

afghanistan_withdrawal-wide

Rebecca Griffin: Unfortunately, the president’s plan allows the war to last indefinitely and leaves in place almost twice as many troops as when he came in office. The American and Afghan people will pay the price for prolonging this disastrous policy.

U.S. Uses Peace Talks to Divide Taliban from Pakistan

karzai-wide

Gareth Porter: Senior Obama administration officials hope to use the talks to sow suspicion between the Taliban and their main ally, thus weakening the Taliban resolve to negotiate on a peace settlement only if the United States offers a timetable for troop withdrawal.

Tax-Deductible Invasions

global cop

Walter Brasch: If 60 million Americans want war, and the cost is a mere $300 million a week, then each supporter would have about $5 per week deducted from his or her paycheck.

Lessons on the Battlefield Need to Be Learned at a Higher Level

two-generals

General David Petraeus, the former military commander of U.S. forces in Iraq and author of the military’s most recent counterinsurgency manual, learned the lessons of the successful British counterinsurgency experience in Malaya in the 1950s. He was able to reduce the violence in Iraq by instituting a policy of U.S. military restraint in that country.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...