How About a Photo ID that Would Actually Help People Vote?

Vote with National IDIn the last two years, since the Republican sweep in the 2010 elections, GOP-controlled legislatures in many states have passed laws requiring photo identification for voters.

It is widely believed that the unspoken intent of these laws is to suppress voting by groups known to be friendly to Democrats, such as African-Americans, Latinos, poor people, and young people.  In a possible miscalculation, the Republicans also make it more difficult for seniors, a group that has recently trended more Republican.

Pennsylvania, has one of the toughest photo ID laws.  A person must have a photo ID, such as a valid Pennsylvania driver’s license, a valid U.S. passport, or an ID issued by a Pennsylvania higher education institution or nursing home (with an expiration date).  If the potential voter has none of these, s/he can obtain a state-issued card from the Department of Transportation.  To do that, one must go to one of the agencies equipped to issue such cards, when they are open (Selinsgrove is the closest to Lewisburg, about 12 miles, and is open 8:30-4:15 on Tuesday, Wednesday, Friday and Saturday).

You must fill out a lengthy application, and bring at least the following:

  • Social Security card;
  • birth certificate with raised seal, certificate of U.S. citizenship or naturalization, or U.S. passport;
  • two proofs of residency such as tax records, lease agreements, utility bills, or a current weapons permit.

The photo ID should then be issued free of charge if the applicant certifies that it is for voting, but there have been numerous documented instances where the applicant was charged.

Many registered voters may lack both a valid photo ID and the requisite documents for obtaining one.  Getting the requisite documents takes both time and money, and may not even be possible in some cases.  The law manifestly discriminates against people without driver’s licenses, since it requires them to travel long distances to the DOT facilities.  People who move frequently from state to state will be serially disadvantaged as compared with those who stay in one place, because different states will have different requirements. Women who change their names with their marital status will be disadvantaged relative to men.

Most fundamentally, laws like Pennsylvania’s transform the right to vote to a privilege: the burden of proof is on the voter.

It need not be this way.  Most democracies have photo IDs for every citizen, issued either by the national government or by states or provinces under federal regulation.  There is no reason every child born and every immigrant naturalized could not have a photo ID that would contain basic information, such as age and residency.

john peelerThe card could be renewable periodically like a passport, and updated as the citizen moves.  Such an ID, automatically available to every citizen and to no one else, could be equivalent to voter registration in the voter’s home district.  One would be registered by virtue of being a citizen.

Now, that’s a photo ID that would enhance democracy, not restrict it.

John Peeler

Posted: Sunday, 20 July 2012

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Comments

  1. Hwood007 says

    I just voted at the court house.  I have two federal ID cards, neither have my address on them but one has my SSAN listed. The clerks wanted an address on the ID so I used my state drivers license to get my ballot. I could have used my utility bill and my federal ID card, but I forgot to bring such a bill.   My state gives provides a free state ID card by going to the drivers license station.  With all the places I go that require some ID, I wonder about the problems of getting such ID.  You need it to smoke, drink, or get senior discounts. I smell a red herron.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *