LA Progressive

Smart Content for Smart People

  • Home
  • About Us
    • About Us / Copyright Info
    • Privacy Policy
  • Topics
    • Animal Rights
    • Climate Change
    • Economic Justice
    • Education Reform
    • Elections and Campaigns
    • Environment
    • Community Calendar
    • Healthcare Reform
    • Immigration Reform
    • Labor
    • Law and Justice
    • LGBTQ
    • Progressive Issues
    • Social Justice / Racism
    • The Media
    • The Middle East
    • War and Peace
  • Authors
    • All Authors
    • Steve Hochstadt
    • Charles D. Hayes
    • David A. Love
    • Diane Lefer
    • Dick Price
    • Jerry Drucker
    • John Peeler
    • Joseph Palermo
    • Tom Hall
    • Sharon Kyle
    • Sikivu Hutchinson
  • Scorecards
    • California Assembly Criminal Justice Scorecard
    • California State Senate Criminal Justice Scorecard
  • Events
    • Left Coast Forum
    • Event Calendar
  • Subscribe

Brexit, Trump, and the Anglo-American “Special Relationship”

o-American Special RelationshipSince this country’s foundation, the United States of America has had an ironically friendly relationship with our old colonial ruler, the United Kingdom. Despite the intense clashes during the American Revolution and the War of 1812, these two countries have otherwise consistently upheld generally amical relations throughout the modern age and into the 21st century.

The weight and validity of the so-called “special relationship” between America and Britain has recently been called into question, primarily due to US President Donald Trump’s populist, fiery rhetoric against immigrants and international trade.

However, the weight and validity of the so-called “special relationship” between America and Britain has recently been called into question, primarily due to US President Donald Trump’s populist, fiery rhetoric against immigrants and international trade, as well as his generally undiplomatic approach to… well, diplomacy! Trump’s retweeting of islamophobic videos by the far-right political party, Britain First (a group with charges of hate speech in the UK), as well as his accidental leaking of classified information, certainly doesn’t help the friendship.

Thus, with the advent of Brexit and the forthcoming crumbling of Britain’s economic and political ties to the rest of Europe, it is worth assessing the value and future of this unique trans-Atlantic alliance between the two major powers.

In British politics, the special relationship is often touted as a remarkable tool the UK holds in diplomatic and commercial affairs, often a concept to help bolster their image on the international stage. America and Britain also have close trade ties, as the UK imports £66.3 billion a year from the US, while America imports £99 billion a year in turn.

Both countries are the biggest sources of foreign investment for each other, trading heavily in pharmaceuticals, aviation, heavy machinery, chemicals, and commercial property. Trade has recently increased its importance in Britain particularly due to their 2016 decision to leave the European Union, a 27-member trade bloc which has the world’s largest single market.

According to Britain’s Office of National Statistics (ONS), US-UK trade increased by 26% between 2011 and 2016, indicating the growing economic value of this special relationship to the United Kingdom. In the same period, EU-UK trade decreased by 3%. Despite this, a lot of the UK’s goods and services end up in Europe, as they export 48% of their goods to the EU, and import 53% of their goods from there as well.

Nevertheless, Britain’s exit from the European Union will most likely make these trends very difficult to maintain without negotiating their membership into the European single market, customs union, or a whole new trade deal (which, as EU officials have pointed out, is highly unlikely within the two-year time frame the UK has to negotiate its exit from the bloc).

Thus, the United Kingdom will have to increase its reliance on other countries outside of Europe, particularly the United States and Canada, to maintain a strong economy. However, as Britain’s largest trade surplus is with the United States, President Trump may not be so inclined to engage in a full-fledged trade agreement due to his general opposition to international trade, as well as his distaste for countries he views as destroying American domestic production, like China.

In military and intelligence affairs, Britain and America are key partners. The two countries hold multiple shared military bases in the Atlantic and Indian Oceans, as well as engage in many military endeavors side-by-side, often (but not always) with the rest of NATO. The 1943 Quebec Agreement established the US and UK’s joint nuclear research operations to create the world’s first nuclear weapons, sharing access to test sites and weapons designs well into the 21st century, as the agreement was renewed in 2001 and 2004.

Thus, Britain and the United States have engaged in military endeavors together for quite some time. However, Trump’s fiery rhetoric and incompetent handling of classified information to other countries (as he did in May 2017 with Russian ambassador Sergei Kislyak and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov) has damaged the UK’s faith in America’s intelligence-keeping capabilities and trustworthiness as a military ally.

At this point, it’s worth evaluating Britain’s position with Europe, seeing that their “special relationship” with America is rather flawed and unstable at the moment. In June 2018, PM Theresa May voted with her Cabinet on Britain’s official plan for Brexit, highlighting what the UK plans to negotiate with the EU on the future of their relationship after they leave the bloc. However, it is important to note that this is simply a proposal for Britain’s future relationship with Europe; This is not a final Brexit deal, it has not been accepted by the EU, nor do many external analysts expect it to. Under the proposed agreement:

  • The UK Parliament would have the final say over how these rules are incorporated into UK law, keeping the right to refuse to do so (problem number one for European diplomats at the negotiating table).
  • the UK would accept continuing “harmonisation” with EU rules on trading goods, covering only those necessary to ensure frictionless trade.
  • There will be different arrangements for trade in services, including financial products, with greater “regulatory flexibility” and “strong reciprocal arrangements.”
  • Freedom of movement as it stands will end, but a “mobility framework” will ensure UK and EU citizens can continue to travel to each other’s territories and apply for study and work.
  • A new customs agreement will be created, with the objective of “a combined customs territory.” The UK will be able to control its own tariffs and develop an independent trade policy
  • The jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice will end, but the UK will pay regard to its decisions in areas where common rules are in force.

On top of that, May refuses to have Britain pay any more membership dues to the EU, which most definitely won’t fly with European diplomats, as other countries with access to the single market are still required to pay some membership dues, so this would be seen as a hypocritical double standard for Britain. Additionally, the UK’s demand for access to free movement of goods without the other three pillars of the European single market (free movement of people, capital, and services, in addition to goods) has already been ruled out by many EU officials, saying that Britain cannot simply “cherry pick” whichever aspects of European Union membership they like.

So, it looks like the UK has a long way to go before they are diplomatically or economically independent enough from Europe in order to leave the EU. Nonetheless, with less than two years to go, the UK’s only other somewhat viable option is a strong rapprochement with America, despite Donald Trump’s volatility and inefficient leadership.

Jack Gil

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

By Jack Gil posted on July 9, 2018

DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed here are those of the individual contributor(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the LA Progressive, its publisher, editor or any of its other contributors.

Comments

  1. Tom Hall says

    July 11, 2018 at 8:53 am

    What might be most noticeable about the “special relationship” this week is how the U.S. president has to SNEAK into Britain, then hide out at one of his own golf courses, not daring even to stop in London to visit (and pussy grab?) the queen or the Prime Minister.

    Lo how the orange have fallen.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Bernie Sanders 2020 Campaign

What the Bernie Sanders 2020 Campaign Means for Progressives

Central Oregon

Flotsam Central Oregon


The LA Progressive cannot publish without your support. Please donate. Thank you.
We Can Impeach Him

Why Protest Trump When We Can Impeach Him?

Matthew Johnson: I don’t see the utility in waiting if there is no guarantee the public will ever see Mueller’s findings—thus averting further outrage that could force the hand of Senate Republicans.





Book-A-Bus



Please CLICK this donate button - we need your support. Thank you, LA Progressive

Article Categories

Africa | Animal Rights | California
Climate Change | Defense | Economic Justice
Education Reform | Elections | Environment
Events | Foreign Policy | Gay Rights
Healthcare Reform | Immigration Reform
Juvenile Justice | Labor | Latin America
Law and Justice | Los Angeles | Prison Reform
Progressive Issues | Science & Religion
Sexism | Social Justice | Terminal Velocity | The Body Politic
| The Media | The Middle East | Veterans
War and Peace | Wellness

The LA Progressive cannot publish without your support. Please donate. Thank you.

Los Angeles

LA County Construction Vote

L.A. Jail Vote: Wrong Side of History

Peter Laarman: Everyone in the auditorium on today could smell the bad faith in the comments of supervisors Barger, Hahn, and Ridley Thomas.

More Posts from Los Angeles

The Middle East

Anti-Semitism Claims

Don’t Let Bogus Claims of “Anti-Semitism” Derail the Pro-Palestinian Movement

Jim Lafferty: The pro-Israeli lobby is rapidly losing its propaganda campaign aimed at silencing those who dare to criticize the bad behavior of the Israel government.

More Posts from The Middle East

Economic Issues

Forex Market

How to Get Started in Forex Market

Daffa Zaky: Probably the number 1 thing you need to understand is to learn the basics first. Forex markets can grow complex as you invest more in the market.

More Posts from Economic Justice

Copyright © 2019 · Dick Price and Sharon Kyle · Log in