Confronting California’s Abuse of Solitary Confinement

solitary-confinement-357Solitary confinement can eat away at someone’s mind, making mental illness worse and leaving many people depressed, suicidal, hopeless or hallucinating. It’s no place for individuals with mental illness.

In 1995, a federal court in California agreed. After a trial exposing the appalling conditions at Pelican Bay—the state’s most notorious, all-isolation, supermax prison and the site of repeated hunger strikes—a federal judge ordered all mentally ill prisoners out of the prison’s security housing unit (SHU) in a case called Madrid v. Gomez.

But, because of the sometimes frustratingly limited nature of legal decisions, this judge’s order only impacted Pelican Bay. While Pelican Bay has for years been notorious for its conditions of extreme isolation—leading thousands of prisoners across California to participate in the largest prisoner hunger strike in history, some for as long as two months—it is the only California prison in which prisoners with mental illness may not be held in solitary confinement as a matter of law. This means that seriously mentally ill prisoners all over California continue to be held in long-term solitary confinement, even though the Madrid order prohibits those conditions for the mentally ill at Pelican Bay.

It’s time to change that. Today in Sacramento, key witnesses, including experts in psychology and corrections practices, will take the stand in support of the first statewide case aimed at getting all mentally ill people in California out of solitary confinement. The case is called Coleman v. Brown, and beginning today these experts will help to expose the extreme and sometimes irreversible damage of holding people with mental illness in solitary confinement.

The Coleman plaintiffs have marshaled stunning evidence to support their claims that all California prisons must remove mentally ill prisoners from solitary confinement. Statewide, according to case filings, about 9 percent of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation’s (CDCR) approximately 123,600 total prisoners are held in some form of segregated housing—but that number includes 21 percent of mentally ill prisoners system-wide. This means that mentally ill prisoners in California are held in disproportionately high numbers in solitary confinement. Even more alarming is evidence uncovered by the Coleman plaintiffs showing the dramatically heightened suicide rate among prisoners in segregated housing: in 2011, more than one third of all suicides in CDCR facilities took place in segregation units; more than half of the individuals who committed suicide in the first half of 2012 were housed in segregation; and 58 percent of the 19 people who have taken their life to date in 2013 occurred in segregation units.

These disproportionately high instances of suicide are unfortunately not surprising to those familiar with the harms of solitary confinement. Psychological studies consistently show that solitary confinement can wreak distinctive harms on prisoners, including heightened symptoms of hopelessness, depression, hallucinations, self-mutilation, suicidal ideation, and suicidal acts. And a 2008 study of California prisons noted a striking correlation between segregated housing and prison incident reports of self-mutilation and suicide.

Although the harms of solitary confinement for mentally ill prisoners are well known, many states, including California, have been slow to catch up to the growing trend against prolonged solitary. Across the country, corrections departments, judges, activists, prisoners and their families alike will be watching to see if the Eastern District of California holds that the CDRC must forbid the housing of mentally ill prisoners in solitary confinement. If the court holds that it must, then California—and the rest of the country—will be forced to rethink its statewide policies governing the use of solitary confinement.

Helen Vera

Helen Vera is a fellow of the National Prison Project at the ACLU


  1. Nina Courtney says

    I can’t believe that it is 2013 and we still have dungeons. Studies show that solitary confinement causes mental issues because it is torture. Mental illness cannot be punished away, either can addiction. Tax payer money would be much better spent on mental health programs and rehab programs. As a society we have to stop building these horrible houses of torture. It is not keeping anyone safer, on the contrary, we are making people sicker and more dangerous. Our prisons are a criminogenic environment for too many reason to go into here, but one thing for sure is society isn’t better off for it.

  2. Betty Garcia says

    Pelican Bay still has a SHU for the mentally ill it is called PSU and they are still placing people there even if against the law. Of course the suicide rate is high we have now seen the videos its damaging just listening to one I can’t even imagen being there and watching and listening to this horror. These sadistic practices need to be outlawed and torture and abuse punished. The law applies to every one no one is above the law and if we don’t do something about this it means we condone this behavior. Mentally ill people are sick people they need treatment, therapy and a caring environment. Abuse and torture will not make them well neither will warehousing them.

  3. Gina says

    The Coleman case is God send, it’s a very well known fact that Solitary Confinement psychological stresses can be clinically distressing as physical torture, while punishing the mentally ill as if they were going to get well. This is Cruel & Unusual Punishment. Just another form of Genocide on the voiceless. This is our modern day Gulags


    Solitary confinement for as little as 72 hours CAUSES mental illness, this article has got it all backwards…..most of these people were not mentally ill when they were first placed in solitary confinement…..This is cruel and unusual punishment and flat out a war on the poor, the inmates that can afford good attorneys do not end up in solitary confinement, where are those statistics? This is modern day slavery and makes our court system look like a joke because judges are making orders and Gov. Brown is basically laughing at them saying he will just shuffle the commodity around, what a shame. This is all on the taxpayers dollar too, torture, inhumane treatment and just down right wrong and against the law and against many court rulings.

  5. says

    The Coleman case has been ongoing since 1993 and is one of the key reasons that the Supreme Court ruled in favor of releasing 40,000 prisoners due to inhumane conditions in 2010. Good to see the ACLU plugging into this case. I attended all the hearings in San Francisco for more than a decade, bringing desperate families with me, none of whom ever received help. Jerry Brown did not comply with any court orders, fought Plata/Coleman hand, tooth and nail the entire time, and should be indicted for all the people who died on his watch. When he came up with the ridiculous side-step “realignment” all he did was move the prisoners around, very few were ever released. Now he is spending billions renting beds and new jails are being built throughout California. For the record.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *