Annette Bernhardt: The inequality debate often focuses on globalization and new technology, but we know that the decline of unions and the falling real value of the minimum wage have also played critical roles.
Leighton Woodhouse: Drought-stricken growers, deprived of surface water for irrigation, are pumping ancient aquifers at a rate that will eventually extinguish them forever, should the water shortage persist.
Joe Mathews: Instances of misconduct will just get worse if the statewide shortage in officers continues to grow.
Jack Lahey: We are moving back to the days of shantytowns and tenement buildings, but now it is more subtle, it’s moving into your uncle’s condo, two families sharing a bungalow or couch surfing.
Joe Mathews: Sure, the 5 and the 101 are efficient. But if you want to find beauty and danger on the roads of California, head east or west.
Joe Mathews: Don’t tell the Coast haters, but Riverside and San Bernardino Counties are driving California’s comeback.
Steve Hochstadt: We are lucky to live in a society where our guilt or innocence is judged by free women and men. But if we want to be tried by a well-functioning jury of our peers, we must be willing to serve.
Joe Mathews: Let’s transform the Golden State into a global destination for retirees in their golden years.
Joe Mathews: Thanks to Xi Jinping, Chinese millionaires have propped up the state’s sagging real estate market, universities, and companies.
View image | gettyimages.com In California’s epic drought, wars over water rights continue, while innovative alternatives for increasing the available water supply go untapped. ars over California’s limited water supply have been going on for at least a century. Water wars have been the subject of some vintage movies, including the 1958 hit The Big […]
Joe Mathews: Anti-corruption laws actually make it harder for us to keep tabs on local elected officials.
Joe Mathews: Between severe drought and predictions of massive flooding, the forecast is bleak.
Brent Budowsky: Can Roberts and the other justices seriously believe that the Congress that enacted this law intended this draconian and destructive outcome, or that the Constitution demands it?