The Obama administration announced Monday that it is no longer fast-tracking offshore drilling projects in deep water by exempting them from detailed environmental review. Specifically, that means projects that use either a subsurface blowout preventer or a blowout preventer on a floating rig will need significantly more environmental review before drilling is allowed.
The exemptions, as we’ve noted, are exclusions to the National Environmental Policy Act, and they’ve long been used to speed the permit process for oil companies and to lighten the paperwork for regulators. These exclusions were expansive, covering the entire central and western part of the Gulf of Mexico—including BP’s plan to drill its “nightmare well” in the Gulf.
Since the Gulf spill, the Obama administration has been revisiting the way drilling projects like BP’s got fast-tracked under these exclusions, which were originally meant to avoid detailed environmental reviews for activities that were sure to have no significant environmental impact.
“In light of the increasing levels of complexity and risk – and the consequent potential environmental impacts – associated with deepwater drilling, we are taking a fresh look at the NEPA process and the types of environmental reviews that should be required for offshore activity,” Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said in a statement.
We’ve reported on the use of categorical exclusions during the BP disaster as well as the unanswered questions about how the near-blanket use of exclusions in the western and central Gulf of Mexico came to be. The White House Council on Environmental Quality had earlier told us that it no longer retains the documents about why the Gulf exclusions were created, but in a report released Monday , it said they were established in 1981 and 1986, “before deepwater drilling became widespread.”
The exclusions were established with the rationale that previous reviews had found that oil spills were unlikely to have significant environmental impacts. From the report:
The agency did not deem a catastrophic spill, comparable to the BP Oil spill, to be a reasonably foreseeable impact, based on historical information on spills in U.S. [Outer Continental Shelf] waters. Since April 20, 2010, that assumption will be revised, and [the Bureau of Ocean Energy] will take steps to incorporate catastrophic risk analysis going forward.
Regulators never conducted a site-specific review of BP’s Macondo well. The agency said in its report that “a site-specific review should also be undertaken in most cases,” and that the process for granting such exemption “was not transparent.” (Read the full report in our document viewer.)
The administration currently has placed a moratorium on deepwater drilling, but after the moratorium is lifted, regulators will require an environmental assessment.
The American Petroleum Institute, a trade group representing the oil and gas industry, is none too pleased by this. In a statement, it argued that environmental review of offshore operations is “already extensive.”
“We’re concerned the change could add significantly to the department’s workload, stretching the timeline for approval of important energy development projects with no clear return in environmental protection,” the group said. “We’re in favor of targeted changes to regulations that enhance safety and environmental protection, provided the changes allow for the efficient moving forward of energy development and job creation.”
But some believe the administration’s latest step doesn’t go far enough. The Center for Biological Diversity, an environmental group that has been critical of the exclusions, called it a “positive step,” but pointed out that shallow-water drilling projects would still get the rubber stamp .
“It is good that the Obama administration is rhetorically committed to ending the use of regulatory shortcuts,” the group’s executive director, Kieran Suckling, said in a statement. But the report and the reforms “fail to address a number of realities, including the fact that non-deepwater offshore oil drilling is as dangerous as deepwater drilling, so full environmental review must also be done for these oil-drilling operations.”
Marian Wang is ProPublica’s first reporter-blogger. She previously worked for Mother Jones, where she spearheaded the magazine’s social media strategy. Since graduating with honors from Northwestern University’s Medill School of Journalism in 2007, she worked in Chicago as a freelance investigative reporter and blogger for The Chicago Reporter, Chi-Town Daily News, and ChicagoNow. She now lives in New York. She likes it a lot. Find Marian on Twitter: @mariancw
Reposted with permission from Pro Publica.Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2010 LA Progressive