South LA Snubbed Again: Broken Promise Zone Promises

Eric Garcetti Barack ObamaPresident Obama announced the first five “Promise Zones” to focus on poverty and income inequality in America. If you remember his 2013 State of the Union address, poverty was going to be a focus of his second term, and he mentioned that his administration would invest in the 20 “hardest hit” cities in this last recession – to get communities back on their feet.

So, everybody knew they were coming. Another promise to tackle the century-old problem of poverty. The reason why poverty exists in America is because of partisan politics. Since Lyndon Johnson’s “War On Poverty” was launched, Democrats funded programs and Republicans defunded programs. Then Democrats started acting like Republicans (Clinton-fiscal conservative, social liberal) and poverty was increased. Remember, Clinton signed Welfare Reform at the demand of Newt Gingrich’s “Contract With America.”

The point is poverty eradication has never gotten a fair chance. It was either a broken promise or no promise. The poverty debate is an engagement in political rhetoric of the worse kind – because it plays with people’s lives in the worst ways. Politicians have promised to get people, places and deprived spaces on their feet for five decades now. Some places were never on their feet to begin with. And some places can’t face up to the promises made to change their realities.

Los Angeles is one such place.

Los Angeles and Philadelphia were the only two top five cities awarded. West Philadelphia is one of the poorest neighborhoods in the nation. It has been — for nearly six decades. Los Angeles’ poorest neighborhoods have been on the city’s South side and East side. Neither received inclusion in Los Angeles’ possible $500 million award—made up of federal tax credits and investment incentives. Just for the record—there are no more poorer areas in Los Angeles than South L.A. and East L.A., if you’re going by zip code. But that’s not what was considered. What was considered was whoever had the foresight to write the proposal. The promise zone was awarded to whoever wrote the proposal and had the relationship with the administration to get a response. It’s not rocket science here.

Los Angeles City Council MapThe awarded zone covers the city’s 13th Council District. The communities of Pico-Union, Westlake, Koreatown, East Hollywood and Hollywood, all (or partially) are within the 13th District. The former councilman of the district is now Mayor, who also is an Obama-ite who helped the President get elected in 2008. The Promise Zone Applications were prepared before he was elected Mayor—and most certainly influenced the outcome in his first six months as Mayor. There were certainly enough Obama-ites in South and East L.A. to do the same.

But they didn’t…


Don’t hate the playa – hate the game. Garcetti (the playa) understood how to leverage the relationship with the President, for the benefit of his then council constituents. They would have gotten the grant even if he wasn’t Mayor—because he was connected and submitted a proposal. The game here is being the first to the table. Closed mouths don’t get fed and latecomers to the game often get leftovers (or nothing at all).

The question everybody should be asking is, why didn’t the council persons for South L.A. (or the last Mayor who made a ga-zillion promises to South L.A.) submit a promise zone application early in the game. And don’t say because South Los Angeles isn’t qualified.

The nonsense I’ve been hearing the last week about South L.A. not having non-profits, or collaborative groups, with the capacity to handle the grants is complete nonsense.

Anybody who tells you the Watts Labor Community Action Committee (WLCAC), who handled the first federal grants after the Watts Riots and has been handling them every since, doesn’t have capacity —is a fool. If they tell you South L.A. doesn’t have collaboratives, they are a fool. The point is, you don’t have to make excuses for excluding the poorest parts of the city when their electeds fall asleep at the switch. To Curren Price’s credit, he called it out—but the zone applications were submitted before he was elected. The excuses are plenty but the reality is the same—South L.A. was left out —again.

The hysteria around South L.A. being excluded from Los Angeles’ “Promise Zone” grants is justified but really shouldn’t surprise anybody. The same thing happened 20 years ago. After the Los Angeles riots in 1992, President Bush (the Elder) toured Los Angeles—said he understood the entrenched poverty and launched an $11 billion  Empowerment Zone/Community Renewal initiative. It was based on the same theory as Obama’s Promise Zone. And produced the same outcome.

This is not new. We’ve been promising to take steps toward poverty eradication a long time.

South Los Angeles is used to broken promises…then and now. Los Angeles got shut out of that process too, because they submitted an inferior proposal written by someone that knew nothing about South Los Angeles. This time, South Los Angeles knew nothing about the process (so their representative claims). Or did too little, too late. Maybe next round? Not likely.

Anthony SamadPoverty is too large a problem nationwide to give one city TWO grants, when more deserving cities won’t get one—at all. We shouldn’t pay attention to the false promises in the apologetic aftermath of remorse. Los Angeles got its nut…now it will have to swallow it.

The Promise Zone award is a demonstration of connected politics being the first at the table. The poverty consideration for the city was secondary. And South Los Angeles loses again.

Anthony Samad
Black Commentator


  1. -Nate says

    As someone who lives in South Central L.A. , I hate this .

    Too many good kids get no or mediocre education and so cannot easily fight for the few jobs available .


  2. jackrabbit says

    The problem isn’t the lack of organizations it is the lack of power. With all the organizations that exist there is still a paucity of total voter registration and turnout throughout these areas — the NGOs have failed to do their job which is not supplying services but organizing the populace to get into action against the powers that ignore them, deprive them, and exploit them. Until the well meaning social workers and community development people re-orient themselves to building power nothing much will happen that has benefit for the local folks living in these large areas. And it can’t be done on a basis of nationalism, organizing one ethnic group to try to get more than another ethnic group because both lose to those who practice divide and conquer. We must all realize that we are in the same fight for a better society and accept that an injury to any brother or sister is an injury to all sisters and brothers and that we all will rise up together. Poor folks advocates get so used to fighting over the crumbs that they never build the unity and power to fight for the loaf.

  3. llozano says

    The hoped for outcome is not about alleviating poverty. The outcome is to encourage more business development through tax incentives. When these have been used in the past the outcome has been anything but desirable for the residents of those areas. So you’ll see more box stores, more unoccupied large building, luxury condos and apartments and the poor will have to go further in to the boonies. Can you say Riverside?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *