LA Progressive

Smart Content for Smart People

  • Home
  • About Us
    • About Us / Copyright Info
    • Privacy Policy
  • Topics
    • Animal Rights
    • Climate Change
    • Economic Justice
    • Education Reform
    • Elections and Campaigns
    • Environment
    • Community Calendar
    • Healthcare Reform
    • Immigration Reform
    • Labor
    • Law and Justice
    • LGBTQ
    • Progressive Issues
    • Social Justice / Racism
    • The Media
    • The Middle East
    • War and Peace
  • Authors
    • All Authors
    • Steve Hochstadt
    • Charles D. Hayes
    • David A. Love
    • Diane Lefer
    • Dick Price
    • Jerry Drucker
    • John Peeler
    • Joseph Palermo
    • Tom Hall
    • Sharon Kyle
    • Sikivu Hutchinson
  • Events
    • Left Coast Forum
    • Event Calendar
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us

One Way to Respond to Foreign Ops in Our Elections

Improving Public Election InformationThe February 16th indictments of 13 Russian nationals for running a covert operation against U.S. elections is welcome news. Such attempted foreign influence is a frontal assault on our democracy, undercutting our aspirations for democratic self-government.

This is not to say that our own U.S. government hasn’t been guilty of the same elsewhere. According to a study by political scientist Dov Levin of Carnegie Mellon University, the U.S. has interfered in 81 foreign elections between 1946 and 2000 alone; during that same period, the Russians (and former Soviets) interfered in 36.

Illicit statecraft on the part of the U.S. and other nations goes back decades if not centuries. But that shouldn’t condone it when done in our name, especially when it conflicts with our stated values. As we aspire to democratic ideals at home, we need to reflect upon our de-stabilizing role abroad, and the inevitable blowback that results.

Self-defense

But we also need to defend ourselves here and now, as every year there are elections in the U.S. on some level. The expansive indictments against Russian nationals are an important first step, creating a potential deterrent by laying out what kind of future foreign interference will be prosecuted (for U.S. citizens, the shoe has yet to drop on how potential domestic collaborateurs may be charged, but these indictments may be laying the foundation for just that).

For the Russian nationals, even if they are never extradited by the Russian Federation, their ability to travel internationally will be greatly restricted, because countries with whom the U.S. has mutual extradition treaties could send them to the U.S. if those Russians try to enter those countries.

At the same time, these indictments can’t address the root of the problem – i.e. the degree that foreign information influence operations are able to be successful in the first place, because they exploit shortcomings in our current political system.

One reason disinformation campaigns can have influence in the U.S., is because voters often lack sufficient real information about the choices before them.

One reason disinformation campaigns can have influence in the U.S., is because voters often lack sufficient real information about the choices before them.

In our unregulated ‘Wild West’ campaign finance system – owing in large part to Supreme Court rulings that equate money with free speech and corporations with people – most candidate information comes from campaigns that can afford expensive partisan mailers and TV ads. Aside from this, there is limited media coverage for state and federal elections, other than for U.S. Senate, President and Governor; and even that is often sensationalist ‘horse-race’ coverage, and not based on actual public policy differences.

The result is that many voters have limited information about their choices, making them more vulnerable to false information when exposed to it.

The Public’s Right to Know

Here in California we could decide that this is a voters rights issue, by dedicating part of the public airwaves and the official voter information guides to provide all voters with a baseline of information about all the choices before them:

  • For coverage of statewide candidates and ballot measures, provide free TV time on the California Channel (California’s own version of C-SPAN) for all ballot-qualified candidates who accept voluntary spending limits. Expand the California Channel to two channels if needed.
  • For coverage of state and Congressional legislative seats, provide free TV time on California Channel and on Governmental channels included as part of local cable franchise agreements, under the Federal Public, Educational, and Governmental Access Channels (“PEG Channels”) set-aside under Section 611 of the Federal Communications Act.
  • Include in this time direct statements from candidates, as well as candidate forums, debates, and other interactive programming.
  • To insulate this free TV time from the politics of the budget process, establish a dedicated, ongoing funding stream that is independent of the governor and state legislature.
  • Provide full and free candidate statements in the official state and county Voter Information Guides for all ballot-qualified candidates who accept voluntary spending limits, instead of today’s ‘pay-to-play’ system charging exorbitant prices for the statements, which results in voters only hearing from candidates who can raise the most money.

Doing all of this would be a giant first step for Californians’ right to know – and is something doable here in California – if the in-state political will is there. Once implemented, it could prove a positive example for the rest of the nation.

Could California go even further with free media? Unfortunately Federal law prevents requiring free TV time from the major networks, which would reach even more people.

In 1996, Congress and the Clinton Administration gave away the rights to our public airwaves to broadcast digital television – a conveyance then worth at least $70 billion – to existing broadcasters in exchange for nothing, as part of the 1996 Telecommunications Act. If lawmakers at that time were concerned about the public’s right to know, they would have required that substantive free time be set aside in the Act for programming to inform the public about its election choices. But they didn’t.

Despite this, California could still go a long way today using our in-state cable options to provide this free tv time to better inform the public.

While too late to fully ramp this up for 2018, there is no reason that such a system could not be in place in California for 2020.

If we are worried about disinformation, why not provide more real information? Surely our democracy is worth it.

Michael Feinstein
2018 candidate for California Secretary of State

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

By Michael Feinstein posted on March 18, 2018

DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed here are those of the individual contributor(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the LA Progressive, its publisher, editor or any of its other contributors.

Comments

  1. Bradley Cunningham says

    March 19, 2018 at 9:09 am

    As long as we continue to place the blame for our damaged democracy on “foreign” entities, we will never gut-out the root causes (some of which are mentioned in the article). Foreign interference and manipulation of the system and voters laughingly pales in comparison to the day in and day out dirty legal manipulations by domestic players. unfortunately,our short and seemingly limited attention spans are swamped with “Russia Did It” hyperbole at the expense of in-depth and ongoing reporting of real culprits.

    Reply
  2. Brian Setzler says

    March 18, 2018 at 12:56 pm

    I think these are great ideas. I’m going to steal them and introduce them in my city and state. Good luck with your campaign. You would make an excellent Secretary of State. #GreenParty

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Thank You For Supporting Independent Media. The LA Progressive cannot publish without your support. Please donate. Thanks....

This Weeks Featured Posts

Nationalize Facebook

Is It Time to Regulate or Nationalize Facebook?

New York Nurses Strike

A Boss is a Boss: Nurses Battle for Their First Union Contract at Albany Medical Center

Iranian American Relations

Iranians in the U.S. and Abroad Are Using Cultural Responses to Overcome Political Tensions 

Trading Chihuahua Desert Hardscrabble for Coast Range Wet

michael bloomberg announces

Veritas Vigil: From Fox’s Media Buzz to Midway





Impeachment TrapIranian American RelationsKerry Endorses BidenHolding Trump AccountableMatt Bevin DepartsDan BrotmanTrump the Anti-ConservativeMoral InjuryUnited World



Sponsored

Best Wedding Photographer Surrey

The Best Wedding Photographer Surrey

Breaking Through the Glass Ceiling: Tips For Women Trying to Market Themselves Online to Potential Employers

More Posts from Sponsored

Book-A-Bus



Article Categories

Africa | Animal Rights | California
Climate Change | Defense | Economic Justice
Education Reform | Elections | Environment
Events | Foreign Policy | Gay Rights
Healthcare Reform | Immigration Reform
Juvenile Justice | Labor | Latin America
Law and Justice | Los Angeles | Prison Reform
Progressive Issues | Science & Religion
Sexism | Social Justice | Terminal Velocity | The Body Politic
| The Media | The Middle East | Veterans
War and Peace | Wellness

Los Angeles

Organizing in South LA

Rethinking 27 Years of Organizing in South LA

Elect Loraine Lundquist

Let’s Elect Loraine Lundquist, a Breath of Fresh Air for City Council 

More Posts from Los Angeles

The Middle East

If Americans Knew

The Most Enduring Media Cover Up

Trump and Netanyahu

Trump and Netanyahu: How the Far Right Subverts Democracy Globally

More Posts from The Middle East

Economic Issues

Race to the Bottom

“Booming” Economy Means More Bad Jobs and Faster Race to the Bottom

billionaires and capitalism

Why Billionaires Don’t Really Like Capitalism

More Posts from Economic Justice

Copyright © 2019 · Dick Price and Sharon Kyle · Log in