That in itself is a feat few candidates maintain in a competitive contest.
Janice Hahn is a pro.
She accurately compared and contrasted herself to her opponents in both the primary and the runoff in effective fashion despite a poor political environment to run as a Democrat. Some will call that negative campaigning.
I call it political reality.
Candidates go negative because it works. It persuades voters. Politics is a contact sport and sometimes you have to get close and mix-it-up with your opponent to win. To run for seven months as Hahn did in an unfamiliar election timetable for voters was challenging enough to say nothing of a new primary process that included a runoff provision. In the end, the process actually worked in favor of Democrats by having Huey in the runoff which allowed Democrats to stop fighting Democrats and focus on the Tea Party conservative.
A Democrat versus Democrat scenario in the runoff would have been further debilitating for morale and might of set-up a potential rematch after redistricting in 2012.
Thankfully, that shouldn’t be the case.
This is why this new primary system needs to be challenged in the courts.
Cannibalization of Democrats in future open primaries needs to be avoided at all costs.
A primary by definition is a partisan process for political parties to choose nominees. It isn’t a process of elimination despite of one’s party preference. Some may say Hahn underperformed in a blue district. I disagree. Given the economy and voter tolerance for candidates & campaigns, this was a solid win.
Congratulations to Congresswoman-elect Hahn on a well deserved victory.
She certainly earned it.