New York Times: Thumbs Up for Gaza Slaughter

NY Times GazaOver the weekend, the New York Times sent out a clear signal: the mass slaughter of civilians is acceptable when the Israeli military is doing the killing.

Under the headline “Israel’s War in Gaza,” the most powerful newspaper in the United States editorialized that such carnage is necessary. The lead editorial in the July 19 edition flashed a bright green light — reassuring the U.S. and Israeli governments that the horrors being inflicted in Gaza were not too horrible.

From its first words, the editorial methodically set out to justify what Israel was doing.

After 10 days of aerial bombardment,” the editorial began, “Israel sent tanks and ground troops into Gaza to keep Hamas from pummeling Israeli cities with rockets and carrying out terrorist attacks via underground tunnels.”

The choice of when to date the start of the crisis was part of the methodical detour around inconvenient facts.

For instance, no mention of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s June 30 announcement that the “human animals” of Hamas would “pay” after three Israeli teenagers kidnapped in Israeli-controlled territory in the West Bank were found dead. No mention of the absence of evidence that Hamas leadership was involved in those murders.

Likewise, absent from the editorializing sequence was Israel’s June “crackdown” in the West Bank, with home raids, area closures, imprisonment of hundreds of Hamas party activists including legislators.

Most of all, the vile core of the Times editorial was its devaluation of Palestinian lives in sharp contrast to Israeli lives.

The Times editorial declared that Hamas leaders “deserve condemnation” for military actions from civilian areas in the dense Gaza enclave — but Netanyahu merited mere expressions of “concern” about “further escalation.” Absent from the editorial was any criticism of Israel’s ongoing bombardment of homes, apartment blocks, hospitals, beaches and other civilian areas with U.S.-supplied ordinance.

At the time, there had been one Israeli death from the hostilities — and at least 260 deaths among Gazans as well as injuries in the thousands. The contrast illuminates a grotesque difference in the Times’ willingness to truly value the humanity of Israelis and Palestinians.

In the morally skewed universe that the Times editorial board evidently inhabits and eagerly promulgates, Hamas intends to “terrorize” Israeli citizens while Israel merely intends to accomplish military objectives by dropping thousands of tons of bombs on Palestinian people in Gaza.

A keynote of the editorial came when it proclaimed: “There was no way Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was going to tolerate the Hamas bombardments, which are indiscriminately lobbed at Israeli population centers. Nor should he.”

While sprinkling in a handwringing couple of phrases about dead and wounded civilians, the editorial had nothing to say in condemnation of the Israeli force killing and maiming them in large numbers.

Between the lines was a tacit message to Israel: Kill more. It’s OK. Kill more.

And to Israel’s patrons in Washington: Stand behind Israel’s mass killing in Gaza. Under the unfortunate circumstances, it’s needed.

No media enabler was more culpable than the editorializing voice of the Times, which had egged on the Israeli assault at the end of a week that began with the United Nations reporting 80 percent of the dead in Gaza were civilians.

When the editorial came off the press, the Israeli military was just getting started. And no doubt Israeli leaders, from Netanyahu on down, were heartened by the good war-making seal of approval from the New York Times

After all, the most influential media voice in the United States — where the government is the main backer of Israel’s power — was proclaiming that the mass killing by the Israeli military was regrettable but not objectionable

The night after the Times editorial went to press, the killing escalated. Among the calamities: the Israeli military shelled the Gaza neighborhood of Shejaiya throughout the night with nonstop tank fire that allowed no emergency services to approach. Eyewitness media reports from Shejaiya recounted scenes of “absolute devastation” with bodies strewn in the streets and the ruins.

Two days after the editorial reached Times newsprint, over 150 more were counted dead in Gaza. No media enabler was more culpable than the editorializing voice of the Times, which had egged on the Israeli assault at the end of a week that began with the United Nations reporting 80 percent of the dead in Gaza were civilians.

The Times editorial was in step with President Obama, who said — apparently without intended irony — that “no country can accept rockets fired indiscriminately at citizens.” Later, matching Israeli rationales for a ground invasion, the president amended his verbiage by saying: “No nation should accept rockets being fired into its borders or terrorists tunneling into its territory.”

An important caveat can be found in the phrases “no country” and “no nation.” The stateless people who live in Gaza — 70 percent of whom are from families expelled from what’s now southern Israel — are a very different matter.

By the lights of the Oval Office and the New York Times editorial boardroom, lofty rhetoric aside, the proper role of Palestinian people is to be slaughtered into submission.

Abba A. Solomon and Norman Solomon

Abba A. Solomon is the author of “The Speech, and Its Context: Jacob Blaustein’s Speech ‘The Meaning of Palestine Partition to American Jews.’” Norman Solomon is co-founder of and executive director of the Institute for Public Accuracy. His books include “War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death.”


  1. Rich Broderick says

    Hamas is the spawn of Israel’s dispossession and oppression of the Palestinians. That country’s rightwing leadership want to be able to say they have not “partner” for peace talks they would like to prevent so they’ve gone about busily helping create organizations like Hamas (which the Israeli government helped fund early in its existence). For the record, though, Hamas fired no missiles into Israel until Israel broke a two-year ceasefire by assaulting Hamas on June 28, supposedly in retaliation for the murder of three Jewish teens near Hebron, a murder in which Hamas probably played no role. Netanyahu knew immediately that the three teens were dead but withheld that information for three weeks while he whipped up racist sentiments against Palestinians, blaming Hamas without any evidence for the killings. Why? Because Hamas had done something that Netanyahu did not like — came to an agreement with the PLA accepting Abbas as the legitimate leader of the Palestinians. What’s happening now in Gaza is nothing more nor less than a massacre — a war crime with no justification. Netanyahu needs to be shipped to the Hague. Where is our storied rendition program when we could really use it?

  2. Gary Corseri says

    As long as we’re quoting Golda Meir, Mr. Lipshultz, let us also recall that she said she could forgive the Palestinians for killing Israeli children, but she could never forgive them for forcing Israel to kill their children!


    In the present murderous campaign in Gaza at least 160 children have been killed and not one Israeli child by the “blood-oath sworn” Hamas rebels! And you have the chutzpah to tell Norman Solomon and Abba A. Solomon to “get real”?

    Since 1948, you write, most of Israel’s neighbors have “sought to wipe its existence from the map.” Now you’re reading from Bibi’s playbook–his and others’ total mis-translation of what Iran’s leader said about the page of history turning upon Israel. If you want a real picture of which country has been wiped off the map, Google some maps of how Palestinian territory has shrunk since 1948!

    You accuse the Solomons of “idealizing” the world because they deplore the brutalization of our world by the US and Israel? “There is no nation on this planet that would have sustained their restraint for as long as Israel has.” Now substitute “Germany” for “Israel” in your sentence above and one hears clear echoes of a fellow named Hitler!

    Re-read your Old Testament, Sir. The first commandment was “Thou shalt not kill.” Then there’s the one about not bearing “false witness.” There is not any about “finally creating greater barriers” between human beings!

  3. Matthew Lipschultz says

    This article is horrid! Some of the worst spin I’ve ever seen. It seems to come from a perspective where you idealize the world, at the expense of reality. I’d like to help. Here’s what’s real. Hamas uses civilians and civilian territories deliberately, to hide what they are doing, or make martyrs for future generations to idolize and follow. There is no nation on this planet that would have sustained their restraint for as long as Israel has, ESPECIALLY when you consider that its been since 1948, that most of Israel’s geographic neighbors have sought to wipe its existence from the map. Hamas even has that goal of Israeli and Jewish extermination IN THEIR CHARTER!!? Enough is enough. The invasion of Gaza is to finally create a greater barrier between Israeli citizens and the harm that Hamas has sworn to inflict, in their blood-oath. In the wise, but bitterly-hard truth that Golda Meir once said, “Peace will come when the Arabs will love their children more than they hate us”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *