Skip to main content
King and Floyd: Will Unequal Justice be Perpetuated?

Photo by Gayatri Malhotra on Unsplash

Every lawsuit tells a story. Some are only about the immediate parties and participants. Others present “big pictures” about our basic institutions, our political and moral values, and, for better or worse, our concepts of justice. 

The Derek Chauvin trial for the murder of George Floyd is one of the most significant and high-profile legal dramas of our time. In big-picture terms, it tells the story of unending racism and unrelenting police brutality in the United States.

U.S. law enforcement has a long and shameful history of violence against unarmed Black people, stretching from the slave patrols of the antebellum south to:

According to a report released by National Public Radio earlier this year, since 2015, police officers have fatally shot at least 135 unarmed Black people across the country. A 2016 study published in the American Journal of Public Health concluded that Black men are nearly three times as likely to die from police use of force as white men. NPR also found that at least 75 percent of the officers involved were white.

In all, police in the United States shoot and kill about 1,000 people a year, according to a database constructed by The Washington Post. Only a small percentage of the cases result in the filing of criminal charges, however. Citing figures compiled by researchers at Bowling Green University, the Post notes that between 2005 and February 2021, a mere 130 officers were charged in connection with a fatal shooting. 

Equally disturbing, less than half of those charged were convicted—whether of murder, manslaughter, or a lesser-included offense like assault.

Buried under the mountain of evidence against him, it's doubtful that Chauvin will be acquitted. Maybe this time, Justice will be served.

Of all comparable incidents, the Floyd case most closely resembles the arrest and savage beating of California motorist Rodney King in 1991. And as the prosecution of Floyd’s accused killer—former Minneapolis police officer Chauvin—approaches its conclusion, it is King’s case that is most troubling as a potential harbinger of an unwelcome outcome.

After a high-speed car chase, King was pulled over by a group of Los Angeles Police Department officers. Alighting from his vehicle, King was ordered to the ground, where he was stunned with a taser, repeatedly kicked in the head and body, and pummeled more than fifty times with police batons until he was rendered motionless, badly bruised and bloodied.

Scroll to Continue

Recommended Articles

As in Floyd’s encounter with Chauvin, King’s beating was videotaped by a civilian who lived in an apartment across the street from the scene of the arrest. Although the video was taken in a pre-Internet age, it nonetheless went viral, airing time and again on TV stations not only in Los Angeles, but around the world, creating a clamor for justice on King’s behalf just as we have seen for Floyd.

Four LAPD officers—three white and one Hispanic—were in due course charged with state crimes under California law for assault and excessive use of force. Astonishingly, despite the graphic violence caught frame by frame on film, all four were acquitted in a trial the following year.

Within hours after the verdicts were announced, Los Angeles erupted in riots, arson, and looting that lasted 6 days and claimed 63 lives. 

The King case illustrates the high bar that even the most skilled criminal prosecutors must meet in police misconduct cases. Although two of the King defendants were convicted in a federal civil rights trial in 1993, the other two were again acquitted.

Every prosecution has its weaknesses, including those with clear video evidence of the crime itself. In the King state court trial, the weak link proved to be the jury’s perception that King, a Black man who stood six feet three inches tall and weighed some 225 pounds, posed a greater danger to public safety than the police who abused him. As one juror told the Los Angeles Times after the verdict, King “brought the beating on himself” by being non-compliant and combative after his arrest. 

If there is a weak link in the Floyd murder trial, as many commentators have suggested, it is likely going to be causation.

To convict Chauvin, prosecutors have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Chauvin, who pressed a knee into Floyd’s neck for nine minutes and twenty-nine seconds, caused Floyd’s death by asphyxiation. In the prosecution’s view, any other contributing conditions, such as Floyd’s pre-existing coronary artery disease or drug use on the day of his arrest, may not be regarded as independent and superseding causes for his demise. The defense needs only to establish reasonable doubt about the precise cause of death.

In the end, the verdict may come down to the instructions on the law of causation that the trial judge reads to the jury after both sides have rested.

Image placeholder title

Despite the mountain of evidence introduced against him, could Chauvin be acquitted or, at the very least, secure a hung jury unable to arrive at a unanimous verdict? It’s doubtful, and there is reason to be optimistic that this time, in this trial, justice will finally be served.

Then again, we’ve heard this story before, and it hasn’t ended well.

Bill Blum
The Progressive