Skip to main content

What motivates painters to create art? There are several possibilities. They paint to entertain people, solve visual issues, communicate ideas, and contribute to a great creative heritage.

Painters express themselves via their work.

This article investigates how and why this occurs by integrating creative psychoanalytic theory with affective philosophical thought. It focuses on the creative experience itself, illuminating the psychological mechanics and dynamics at work behind the emotions at stake. Painters' accounts of how they feel at work are utilized to provide a realistic, true-to-life depiction of the painting process.

The Brain and Visual Artistic Creativity

Creativity manifests ordered relationships via creating new or innovative knowledge (e.g., finding and revealing the thread that unites). Studying people with brain disorders and how these diseases affect various processes may better understand certain cognitive tasks and behaviors. Understanding the anatomy and physiology that may support these activities is the first significant step in determining how the brain mediates any action.

Paintings as Effective Scaffolding

Painting may be classified in a variety of ways. Aside from painting on canvas, it may also entail purchasing and preparing the appropriate supplies, acquiring ideas and inspiration from many sources, and musing over the work outside the studio. According to many artists and experts, painting is a dialogue between the creator and the evolving piece of art. Painting is an open-ended inquiry process rather than implementing completely established ideas or goals when viewed in this light.

Scroll to Continue

Recommended Articles

Painting and Existential Feeling

It is often assumed that the ability of artworks to elicit emotional responses in viewers is a normal and unproblematic phenomenon. We may experience grief or sympathy for fictitious people, dread at the sight of scary creatures on the big screen, and delight at hearing peppy, pleasant melodies. No matter how natural they are, these common notions become troublesome when we begin to express other common concepts about emotion and our relationship with artworks. It might explain why so many of us are art buyers in the first place. Many of us believe that good art should not leave us chilly.

A Case of David J Marchi; a Prodigy

David J Marchi's interest in painting arose from a damaged back suffered in a boating accident in 2015; Marchi had never painted before. Marchi was diagnosed with Acquired Savant Syndrome, a rare syndrome in which previously non-disabled people develop dormant savant talents after a spinal or brain injury or sickness. There have only been 300 recorded cases globally, and their newly discovered abilities may be divided into five categories: music, calendar calculation, arithmetic, painting, and spatial or mechanical talents. People diagnosed with this rare disease frequently find a way to channel their newfound abilities into a sort of enthusiasm. Marchi is recognized for his "daring" acrylic abstract paintings that almost dance with intensity and unpredictability.

Marchi's creativity is frequently portrayed as a light bulb moment or a flash of inspiration; it is typically a long-term commitment – sometimes spanning a lifetime. Consider Darwin's theory of evolution, a steady accumulation of evidence and hypotheses over years that resulted in a game-changing theory.

Creative people are frequently obliged to build their occupations and careers. Before Freud, there were no psychoanalysts and no radiologists before Roentgen. It is also true for authors, painters, and musicians: while such jobs exist, they must develop their unique voices, and there is no fixed recipe for success.


Integrating modern psychoanalytic and philosophical thought and being true to painters' experiential depictions of the painting process. Overall, it broadens our knowledge of creative creation and offers more light on how and why we feel the way we do. Finally, we'd want to return briefly to extended affectivity. Again, supporters of this viewpoint believe that portions of the environment can initiate and manage emotional processes to the point where they become ontologically fundamental parts of these processes.