A statute of limitations is a limit set by lawmakers which effectively limits how long a party affected by a crime has to initiate legal proceedings. It's a term you've probably heard quite a lot but may not yet fully understand.
The basic drive behind statutes of limitation is to help prevent abuse and error. However, we will also discuss the controversies these statutes can have. While most agree they have a place, exactly where these limitations need to be is hotly debated.
The Statute of Limitations Basics
To begin simply, imagine a statute of limitation as a timer. Once an offense has been committed, that timer begins. The relevant party has until the allotted time to initiate legal proceedings.
Statutes of limitations most often apply in civil cases. The statute sets a firm deadline on when you can and cannot sue. The window tends to be relatively wide but does not last forever.
For example, you may contend with a statute of limitations when pursuing a car accident injury case. In North Carolina, this deadline is generally 3 years (with 2-3 years typical for most states). You must pursue the case within this time or your case is essentially void.
Note that it is (legally speaking) irrelevant if a given offense occurred or not in these cases. You have no case, except in very rare circumstances, once the statute of limitations has been hit.
Criminal offenses also sometimes have statutes of limitations. While crimes like murder rarely do, this isn't true of all serious offenses. Even arson and sexual assault sometimes have statutes of limitations attached to them.
These limitations otherwise largely work like they do in civil cases. You cannot be charged with a crime, whether you committed it or not, once the statute of limitations has been reached.
Limitations vary widely by state and are very important to keep in mind if you don't want to immediately pursue legal action. If you think a criminal or civil offense has been committed against you, research whether the offense has a statute of limitations.
Intentions and Exceptions
The intention of putting statutes of limitations in place is ostensibly to protect accused parties from certain injustices.
As time passes, memories fade. Evidence can be lost, damaged, or corrupted. In essence, the details of the case can become less and less clear.
These statutes can also at least partially help to prevent other abuses too. It makes it more difficult, for example, for a person to blackmail another if an offense is committed ("I won't report X if you do Y").
Furthermore, there comes a certain point for minor crimes where the state would often rather the truth just come out, even if a criminal escapes justice. It may be better to allow a criminal to talk truthfully about what they've done after a time. Then law enforcement and affected parties can at least understand what was done and potentially correct the problem if necessary.
However, there are exceptions where statutes of limitations are never or almost never put in place.
As touched on, murder almost never has a set maximum period for pursuing charges. Increasingly states also have no limitations for other serious crimes, such as sexual violence against children.
Others put special measures in place so that children have a window once they become adults to pursue charges. This was done in 2019 in New York with the Child Victims Act.
This act greatly extended the window adults who were abused as children has to sue their abusers. It also extended their ability to have charges brought against those abusers in a criminal court.
International law also establishes certain crimes as being without any kind of time window for charges. Crimes against humanity, war crimes, and genocide are all charges that can be pursued at any time (largely due to their severity and scale).
Statutes of limitations are hugely controversial, specifically when it comes to sexual assault and any sort of abuse committed against children.
Crimes such as sexual assault can greatly traumatize victims and make them feel a deep sense of shame. Unfortunately, this same shame and trauma can make them hesitant to pursue charges.
By the time a victim may be ready to come forward, the statute of limitations might be passed. This applies to any abuse of children too. By the time they have the autonomy to seek legal action, it might be too late.
RAINN, an organization whose goal is to protect and advocate for victims of rape, abuse, and incest, outlines some measures that make for effective statutes of limitations:
- Statutes of limitations should never be applied to serious sex crimes.
- Failure to report a crime to the police should not result in a lower time to pursue legal action.
- DNA evidence should extend the time a case can be pursued, potentially indefinitely, as DNA evidence does not erode once properly stored.
- Crimes against children should have no statutes of limitations.
- Exceptions need to be possible under extraordinary circumstances, such as clerical error delaying or otherwise damaging a case.
As things stand, statutes of limitations sometimes protect individuals for which there is a clear case against them. There are cases in which people who all evidence suggests have committed serious crimes walk free because of poorly set limits.
Time is of the Essence
Regardless of the offense committed, understanding whether a statute of limitations applies can make or break your case. Whether you're suing, getting someone charged in a criminal court, or both, it is a vital detail.
Readers are often encouraged to advocate for more just limitations, designed to help protect victims, especially those for who reporting a crime may be difficult.
If you found this article useful and informative, we have plenty more. Learn more about the state of the world, social injustices, and the ways you might be able to help.