Definition two was close: “A very temperamental person with an inflated view of their [sic] own talent or importance.”
Todd is an NBC TV celebrity news hound. He is in high dudgeon over popular TV comic Stephen Colbert’s fake run for president.
“He is making a mockery of the system,” Todd recently complained at a college forum. He added that Colbert and Jon Stewart, Colbert’s sidekick in satire, are “….mocking what we’re doing.” By “we” he meant the media.
This old newspaper reporter hopes Colbert and Stewart keep pouring it on.
Neither is mocking the system. They are mocking what’s mocking the system: super PACs and the gazillions of dollars they are lavishing on candidates – most of them Republicans.
I guess Todd wanted to show he was a “fair and balanced” journalist by conceding that the “process” of choosing presidential candidates is “a mess.”
But he also is bothered that Colbert’s “agenda…may be anti-Republican.” Never mind that Herman Cain, the former GOP presidential candidate, played along with Colbert’s spoof.
And so what if Colbert’s agenda is “anti-Republican?” Any GOP-friendly comedian-satirist – evolution-doubting Ben Stein, say – is free to make a bogus bid (or a real run) for the Oval Office and trot out an “anti-Democratic agenda.”
On the other hand, Todd’s on the money when he said Colbert is mooning the Fourth Estate. I suspect that’s mostly what got Todd’s goat.
Colbert, who pretends to be another vapid, right-wing Fox News-style TV talking head, has been at it for years. He famously fricasseed capital city media VIPs like Todd at the 2006 White House press corps dinner. It was while George W. Bush was commander in chief.
Colbert didn’t just roast Bush. He damned the media glitterati with feigned praise:
“Over the last five years you people were so good — over tax cuts, WMD intelligence, the effect of global warming. We Americans didn’t want to know, and you had the courtesy not to try to find out. Those were good times, as far as we knew.”
The dinner was not a good time for the news worthies. The Washington Post said Colbert’s shtick “fell flat” and The New York Times didn’t even report the parody, according to Times Columnist Frank Rich.
“But to the Beltway’s bafflement, Colbert’s riff went viral overnight, ultimately to have a marathon run as the most popular video on iTunes,” Rich added. “The cultural disconnect between the journalism establishment and the public it aspires to serve could not have been more vividly dramatized.”
Anyway, I imagine much of the public thinks Colbert’s satire is spot on, too. But could it be that Todd is still steamed at Colbert for daring to suggest that media luminaries like him might be more lapdog than watchdog?
“By all means let’s mock the old mainstream media as they preen and party on in a Washington ballroom,” Rich also wrote of the big-time media’s close encounter of the worst kind with Colbert in ’06.
“What Colbert is doing is far more edifying and far more informative than any interview Chuck Todd has offered,” Nicole Belle suggested on the Crooks & Liars Internet website. “But because it’s not from a Very Serious Villager, like Todd, it’s dismissed summarily.”
While Todd dismisses — and disses — Colbert’s sassy send up of the media, John and Jane Q Public don’t seem to be sharing his umbrage.